Suraj Apparao Joshi vs Dainik Bhaskar Group Advocate - A.B.Waikos — 330/2017
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act 1971 Section 28. Status: DID. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.
COMPLAINT ULP
CNR: MHIC200009822016
Next Hearing
07th April 2026
Filing Number
756/2017
Filing Date
23-11-2017
Registration No
330/2017
Registration Date
23-11-2017
Court
Industrial Court, Aurangabad
Judge
1-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT, AURANGABAD.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Suraj Apparao Joshi
Adv. G.S.Telangre
Respondent(s)
Dainik Bhaskar Group Advocate - A.B.Waikos
Hearing History
Judge: 1-MEMBER, INDUSTRIAL COURT, AURANGABAD.
DID
Evidence
Evidence
Order on Exh..... R
Order on Exh..... R
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | DID |
| 06-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 07-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 02-12-2025 | Order on Exh..... R |
| 14-11-2025 | Order on Exh..... R |
Interim Orders
Summary The Industrial Court at Aurangabad rejected the complainant Suraj Apparao Joshi's application seeking amendment to his original complaint (ULP No. 330/2017) against Dainik Bhaskar Group. The court found the amendment application filed nearly six years after his dismissal on 24/09/2018 was not maintainable, as the issues of charge sheet and dismissal were already being separately adjudicated in another pending complaint (ULP No. 40/2022) before the Labour Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Industrial Court at Aurangabad rejected the complainant Suraj Apparao Joshi's application seeking amendment to his original complaint (ULP No. 330/2017) against Dainik Bhaskar Group. The court found the amendment application filed nearly six years after his dismissal on 24/09/2018 was not maintainable, as the issues of charge sheet and dismissal were already being separately adjudicated in another pending complaint (ULP No. 40/2022) before the Labour Court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts