Anirappa Irnna Hulle vs Solapur Muncipal Transport Undertaking Advocate - S H Kokare — 39/2022
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28. Status: Argument. Next hearing: 04th April 2026.
Complaint ULP1
CNR: MHIC130000642022
Filing Number
64/2022
Filing Date
29-Apr-2022
Registration No
39/2022
Registration Date
29-Apr-2022
Court
Industrial Court, Solapur
Judge
1-Member, Industrial Court, Solapur
Last updated 26-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Anirappa Irnna Hulle
Adv. Deshpande V.R.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Solapur Muncipal Transport Undertaking Advocate - S H Kokare
Case History
-
04-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Argument
Member, Industrial Court, Solapur
-
31-Jan-2026
Respondent Evidence
Member, Industrial Court, Solapur
-
09-Jan-2026
Respondent Evidence
Member, Industrial Court, Solapur
-
08-Dec-2025
Copy of DecreeView PDF
Summary The Industrial Court of Solapur dismissed the petition (ULP No. 39/2022) filed by Sri Anirappa Iranna Hulle regarding claims of permanent employment and service benefits. The court found the petitioner's claims regarding 32 years of service and eligibility for permanent employee benefits to be unsupported by documentary evidence, and held that the claims were invalid and improper. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Dec-2025
Additional Evidence
Member, Industrial Court, Solapur
-
31-Oct-2025
Cross Examination
Member, Industrial Court, Solapur
-
19-Sep-2025
Cross Examination
Member, Industrial Court, Solapur
-
21-Aug-2025
Cross Examination
Member, Industrial Court, Solapur
-
21-Jun-2025
Evidence
Member, Industrial Court, Solapur
-
25-Apr-2025
Complainant Evidence
Member, Industrial Court, Solapur
-
12-Mar-2025
Written Statement
Member, Industrial Court, Solapur
-
28-Feb-2025
Written Statement
Member, Industrial Court, Solapur
-
27-Jan-2025
Written Statement
Member, Industrial Court, Solapur
-
11-Dec-2024
Written Statement
Member, Industrial Court, Solapur
-
22-Nov-2024
Mediation Report
Member, Industrial Court, Solapur
-
06-Nov-2024
Mediation Report
Member, Industrial Court, Solapur
-
04-Oct-2024
Written Statement
Member, Industrial Court, Solapur
-
12-Sep-2024
Argument on U-2
Member, Industrial Court, Solapur
-
16-Aug-2024
Argument on U-2
Member, Industrial Court, Solapur
-
05-Jul-2024
Written Statement
Member, Industrial Court, Solapur
-
12-Jun-2024
Argument on U-2
Member, Industrial Court, Solapur
-
08-May-2024
Argument on U-2
Member, Industrial Court, Solapur
-
04-Apr-2024
Argument on U-2
Member, Industrial Court, Solapur
-
11-Mar-2024
Argument on U-2
Member, Industrial Court, Solapur
-
22-Feb-2024
Argument on U-2
Member, Industrial Court, Solapur
-
10-Jan-2024
Argument on U-2
Member, Industrial Court, Solapur
-
29-Nov-2023
Argument on U-2
Member, Industrial Court, Solapur
-
26-Oct-2023
Argument on U-2
Member, Industrial Court, Solapur
-
18-Sep-2023
Argument on U-2
Member, Industrial Court, Solapur
-
17-Aug-2023
Argument on U-2
Member, Industrial Court, Solapur
-
02-Aug-2023
Argument on U-2
Member, Industrial Court, Solapur
-
21-Jul-2023
Argument on U-2
Member, Industrial Court, Solapur
-
09-Jun-2023
Argument on U-2
Member, Industrial Court, Solapur
-
03-Apr-2023
Written Statement
Member, Industrial Court, Solapur
-
08-Mar-2023
Written Statement
Member, Industrial Court, Solapur
-
24-Jan-2023
Written Statement
Member, Industrial Court, Solapur
-
15-Dec-2022
Written Statement
Member, Industrial Court, Solapur
-
07-Nov-2022
Say
Member, Industrial Court, Solapur
-
21-Sep-2022
Say
Member, Industrial Court, Solapur
-
20-Jul-2022
Say
Member, Industrial Court, Solapur
-
10-Jun-2022
Say
Member, Industrial Court, Solapur
-
06-May-2022
Say
Member, Industrial Court, Solapur
-
29-Apr-2022
Copy of DecreeView PDF
-
29-Apr-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Apr-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 39/2022
Summary The Industrial Court of Solapur dismissed the petition (ULP No. 39/2022) filed by Sri Anirappa Iranna Hulle regarding claims of permanent employment and service benefits. The court found the petitioner's claims regarding 32 years of service and eligibility for permanent employee benefits to be unsupported by documentary evidence, and held that the claims were invalid and improper. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts