Smt. Swati Santosh Thorve and others vs Ms. Narsinh Sarswati Medical Foundation Advocate - S. K. Dang — 5000291/2015
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28. Status: Cross Examination Of Respondent. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
Complaint ULP I
CNR: MHIC120004742015
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
Filing Number
5000509/2015
Filing Date
13-10-2015
Registration No
5000291/2015
Registration Date
13-10-2015
Court
Industrial Court, Pune
Judge
1-MEMBER, 1st INDUSTRIAL COURT, PUNE.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Smt. Swati Santosh Thorve and others
Adv. U. S. Gopale
Respondent(s)
Ms. Narsinh Sarswati Medical Foundation Advocate - S. K. Dang
Hearing History
Judge: 1-MEMBER, 1st INDUSTRIAL COURT, PUNE.
Cross Examination Of Respondent
Cross Examination Of Respondent
Cross Examination Of Respondent
Cross Examination Of Respondent
Cross Examination Of Respondent
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Cross Examination Of Respondent |
| 18-02-2026 | Cross Examination Of Respondent |
| 06-02-2026 | Cross Examination Of Respondent |
| 20-01-2026 | Cross Examination Of Respondent |
| 07-01-2026 | Cross Examination Of Respondent |
Interim Orders
This document records testimony proceedings in an Industrial Court complaint (ULP No.291/2015) resumed on 16/10/2024 in Pune. The complainant, an Aya who worked at a hospital since 2013, testified about her employment conditions, salary progression (Rs. 3,000 to Rs. 9,000 monthly), and alleged non-payment of statutory benefits like leaves, HRA, and LTA. During cross-examination, she admitted to lacking documentary evidence for several claims, including biometric attendance records and union membership. No final order on the merits is provided in this excerpt—it represents only the examination/cross-examination phase of ongoing proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document records testimony proceedings in an Industrial Court complaint (ULP No.291/2015) resumed on 16/10/2024 in Pune. The complainant, an Aya who worked at a hospital since 2013, testified about her employment conditions, salary progression (Rs. 3,000 to Rs. 9,000 monthly), and alleged non-payment of statutory benefits like leaves, HRA, and LTA. During cross-examination, she admitted to lacking documentary evidence for several claims, including biometric attendance records and union membership. No final order on the merits is provided in this excerpt—it represents only the examination/cross-examination phase of ongoing proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts