Madhukar Gajajnan Kadam vs Managing Director, Vasantdada Shetkari Sah. Sakhar Karkhana and other Advocate - Mutalik Sandeep Shashikant — 14/2019
Case under Animal Birth Control (Dogs) Rules - 2009 Section 9 &10. Status: Hearing below Exh._______. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.
Complaint ULP
CNR: MHIC100000292019
Next Hearing
08th April 2026
Filing Number
29/2019
Filing Date
26-02-2019
Registration No
14/2019
Registration Date
26-02-2019
Court
Industrial Court ,Sangli
Judge
1-Member, Industrial Court, Sangli
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Madhukar Gajajnan Kadam
Adv. Yadav Dhairyasheel Shamarao
Respondent(s)
Managing Director, Vasantdada Shetkari Sah. Sakhar Karkhana and other Advocate - Mutalik Sandeep Shashikant
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Member, Industrial Court, Sangli
Hearing below Exh._______
Hearing below Exh._______
Hearing below Exh._______
Hearing below Exh._______
Hearing below Exh._______
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Hearing below Exh._______ |
| 06-03-2026 | Hearing below Exh._______ |
| 18-02-2026 | Hearing below Exh._______ |
| 28-01-2026 | Hearing below Exh._______ |
| 08-01-2026 | Hearing below Exh._______ |
Interim Orders
Summary The Industrial Court (Member Court, Sangli) partially granted the complainant's applications for document production dated 25th April 2022. The court rejected the demand for wage registers, bonus registers, and leave registers (2003-2020) as irrelevant to the actual claims, but allowed and directed the respondents to produce the tripartite agreement dated 04/07/2017 between Respondent No.1, Respondent No.2, and Sangli DCC Bank, finding it necessary to determine liability regarding the complainant's retention allowance claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Industrial Court (Member Court, Sangli) partially granted the complainant's applications for document production dated 25th April 2022. The court rejected the demand for wage registers, bonus registers, and leave registers (2003-2020) as irrelevant to the actual claims, but allowed and directed the respondents to produce the tripartite agreement dated 04/07/2017 between Respondent No.1, Respondent No.2, and Sangli DCC Bank, finding it necessary to determine liability regarding the complainant's retention allowance claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts