Shri. Mahesh Ramchandra Joshi vs M. S. R. T. C. Kolhapur. Advocate - V. S. Chavan — 35/2024
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28. Status: Evidence of Complianant. Next hearing: 30th March 2026.
Complaint ULP
CNR: MHIC090000622024
Next Hearing
30th March 2026
Filing Number
65/2024
Filing Date
02-04-2024
Registration No
35/2024
Registration Date
02-04-2024
Court
Industrial Court, Kolhapur
Judge
2-Member, Industrial Court No. 2
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shri. Mahesh Ramchandra Joshi
Adv. D. S. Joshi
Respondent(s)
M. S. R. T. C. Kolhapur. Advocate - V. S. Chavan
M. S. R. T. C. Radhanagari Depot
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Member, Industrial Court No. 2
Evidence of Complianant
Evidence of Complianant
Interim Application Order
Interim Application Order
Argument on Interim Relief
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence of Complianant |
| 23-02-2026 | Evidence of Complianant |
| 04-02-2026 | Interim Application Order |
| 20-01-2026 | Interim Application Order |
| 07-01-2026 | Argument on Interim Relief |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Industrial Court No. 02, Kolhapur - Complaint (U.L.P.) No. 35/2024 The Industrial Court rejected the interim relief application filed by Mahesh Ramchandra Joshi, a Head Mechanic at Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, seeking to stay salary reduction Order No. 13/24 dated 18/03/2024. The court found that the complainant failed to establish a prima facie case, as his salary was incorrectly fixed in 2011 with an unauthorized 3% increment, and the employer's recalculation to correct the overpayment was legally valid and not an unfair labor practice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Industrial Court No. 02, Kolhapur - Complaint (U.L.P.) No. 35/2024 The Industrial Court rejected the interim relief application filed by Mahesh Ramchandra Joshi, a Head Mechanic at Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation, seeking to stay salary reduction Order No. 13/24 dated 18/03/2024. The court found that the complainant failed to establish a prima facie case, as his salary was incorrectly fixed in 2011 with an unauthorized 3% increment, and the employer's recalculation to correct the overpayment was legally valid and not an unfair labor practice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts