Mr.Ashok Ramji Pawar vs BEST Undertaking Advocate - G R Naik — 259/2022
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 06th April 2026.
Complaint ULP1
CNR: MHIC010014812022
Filing Number
1524/2022
Filing Date
18-Oct-2022
Registration No
259/2022
Registration Date
19-Oct-2022
Court
Industrial Court, Mumbai
Judge
6-Member
Last updated 26-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Mr.Ashok Ramji Pawar
Adv. J.N.Tiwari
Respondent(s)
-
1.BEST Undertaking Advocate - G R Naik
-
2.General maneger
Case History
-
06-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Mar-2026
Evidence
Member
-
06-Mar-2026
Evidence
Member
-
27-Feb-2026
Hearing below Exh._______
Member
-
16-Feb-2026
Argument
Member
-
09-Jan-2026
Order below Exh---View PDF
Summary: The Industrial Court, Mumbai granted the complainant's application to produce documents related to his illness on record, despite his evidence being closed. The court permitted this in the interests of justice and to avoid multiplicity of proceedings, subject to strict proof of the documents. The respondents retain the right to rebut the documents produced. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Jan-2026
Argument
Member
-
15-Dec-2025
Hearing below Exh._______
Member
-
01-Dec-2025
Hearing below Exh._______
Member
-
17-Nov-2025
Say
Member
-
31-Oct-2025
Say
Member
-
27-Oct-2025
Argument
Member
-
17-Oct-2025
Argument
Member
-
06-Oct-2025
Argument
Member
-
29-Sep-2025
EvidenceView PDF
-
29-Sep-2025
Argument
Member
-
08-Sep-2025
Cross Examination
Member
-
11-Aug-2025
Cross Examination
Member
-
28-Jul-2025
Cross Examination
Member
-
14-Jul-2025
Cross Examination
Member
-
23-Jun-2025
Cross Examination
I.c.member
-
28-Apr-2025
EvidenceView PDF
-
28-Apr-2025
Cross Examination
Member
-
22-Apr-2025
Respondent Evidence
Member
-
04-Apr-2025
Respondent Evidence
Member
-
07-Mar-2025
Respondent Evidence
Member
-
10-Feb-2025
Respondent Evidence
Member
-
03-Feb-2025
Cross Examination
Member
-
06-Jan-2025
Service Report
Member
-
13-Dec-2024
Evidence
Member
-
08-Nov-2024
Evidence
Member
-
09-Oct-2024
Evidence
Member
-
09-Sep-2024
Evidence
Member
-
12-Aug-2024
Evidence
Member
-
26-Jul-2024
Service Report
Member
-
12-Jul-2024
Service Report
Member
-
28-Jun-2024
Order below Exh---View PDF
-
28-Jun-2024
Service Report
Member
-
08-May-2024
Order below Exh.______
Member
-
24-Apr-2024
Order below Exh.______
Member
-
15-Apr-2024
Order below Exh.______
Member
-
10-Apr-2024
Say
Member
-
15-Mar-2024
Say
Member
-
28-Feb-2024
Evidence
Member
-
09-Feb-2024
Evidence
Member
-
24-Jan-2024
Cross Examination
Member
-
01-Jan-2024
Cross Examination
Member
-
09-Dec-2023
Evidence
Member
-
08-Nov-2023
Lok-Adalat
Member
-
10-Oct-2023
Evidence
Member
-
13-Sep-2023
Evidence
Member
-
09-Sep-2023
Evidence
Member
-
22-Aug-2023
Lok-Adalat
Member
-
28-Jul-2023
Evidence
Member
-
04-Jul-2023
Documents Issues
Member
-
06-Jun-2023
Documents Issues
Member
-
19-Apr-2023
Documents Issues
Member
-
17-Mar-2023
Documents Issues
Member
-
01-Mar-2023
Documents Issues
Member
-
13-Feb-2023
Written Statement
Member
-
20-Jan-2023
Written Statement
Member
-
19-Dec-2022
Apparance
Member
-
23-Nov-2022
Apparance
Member
-
19-Oct-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Oct-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 259/2022
Summary: The Industrial Court, Mumbai granted the complainant's application to produce documents related to his illness on record, despite his evidence being closed. The court permitted this in the interests of justice and to avoid multiplicity of proceedings, subject to strict proof of the documents. The respondents retain the right to rebut the documents produced. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts