Azmat Ali Shaikh vs Hotel Grand Hyatt Mumbai Advocate - Puri/Paresh-1/Kharawal-4,5, — 28/2022
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 44. Status: Argument. Next hearing: 30th March 2026.
Revn. Appln. ULP
CNR: MHIC010009852022
Next Hearing
30th March 2026
Filing Number
1024/2022
Filing Date
10-06-2022
Registration No
28/2022
Registration Date
17-06-2022
Court
Industrial Court, Mumbai
Judge
6-Member
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Azmat Ali Shaikh
Adv. J N Tiwari
Respondent(s)
Hotel Grand Hyatt Mumbai Advocate - Puri/Paresh-1/Kharawal-4,5,
Juniper Hotel Pvt.LTd.
Adv. S Kharawal-4,5,
Arun Kumar Saraf
Fortpoint LEasing Solutions
Adv. Sunil Kharawl
Fort Point automotive Pvt.Ltd.
Adv. Sunil Kharawl
Sandip Kumar Bafna
Adv. Sunil Kharawl
Ramkumar Nadar
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Member
Argument
Argument
Argument
Argument
Hearing below Exh._______
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Argument |
| 06-03-2026 | Argument |
| 23-02-2026 | Argument |
| 30-01-2026 | Argument |
| 06-01-2026 | Hearing below Exh._______ |
Interim Orders
The Industrial Court rejected the application filed by Opponents 4, 5, and 6 seeking to delete Opponent No. 7 from the revision proceedings. The court held that since Opponent No. 7 was made a party in the original Labour Court proceedings and may serve as a material witness, his deletion cannot be considered at this stage. Application Exhibit CA-3 was accordingly rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Industrial Court rejected the application filed by Opponents 4, 5, and 6 seeking to delete Opponent No. 7 from the revision proceedings. The court held that since Opponent No. 7 was made a party in the original Labour Court proceedings and may serve as a material witness, his deletion cannot be considered at this stage. Application Exhibit CA-3 was accordingly rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts