Vijay Madhusudan Gawde vs Tata Mill Advocate - M V Bhat — 279/2025
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28/30. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT on 13th March 2026.
Complaint ULP1
CNR: MHIC010006342025
Filing Number
743/2025
Filing Date
06-10-2025
Registration No
279/2025
Registration Date
07-10-2025
Court
Industrial Court, Mumbai
Judge
6-Member
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vijay Madhusudan Gawde
Adv. Koyande/S R Pawar
Respondent(s)
Tata Mill Advocate - M V Bhat
The General Manager, Tata Mill
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Member
Disposed
Argument
Argument
Argument
Respondent Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-03-2026 | Argument |
| 06-03-2026 | Argument |
| 04-03-2026 | Argument |
| 18-02-2026 | Respondent Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Industrial Court, Maharashtra found that Tata Mills committed unfair labour practice under Item 9 of Schedule IV of the MRTU & PULP Act, 1971 by illegally retiring employee Vijay Madhusudan Gawde at age 60 without documentary evidence of inefficiency. The court held that Standing Order Clause 20-A mandatorily requires male operatives to be retained until age 63 if efficient, and since the respondents failed to prove inefficiency through any memo, medical report, or charge sheet, the employee is entitled to continue working until age 63. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The Industrial Court, Maharashtra found that Tata Mills committed unfair labour practice under Item 9 of Schedule IV of the MRTU & PULP Act, 1971 by illegally retiring employee Vijay Madhusudan Gawde at age 60 without documentary evidence of inefficiency. The court held that Standing Order Clause 20-A mandatorily requires male operatives to be retained until age 63 if efficient, and since the respondents failed to prove inefficiency through any memo, medical report, or charge sheet, the employee is entitled to continue working until age 63. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts