State of Maharashtra vs Rajanna Payanna Yelkuchiwar and other Advocate - M.D.Sahare, Ku. M.K. Atmande — 1200070/2015
Case under Wild Life (Protection) Act Section 9,39,44,48,49,50,51. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 12th May 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHGA090006762015
Filing Number
1200635/2015
Filing Date
21-09-2015
Registration No
1200070/2015
Registration Date
21-09-2015
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Chamorshi
Judge
10-Jt. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC, Chamorshi
Decision Date
12th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Rajanna Payanna Yelkuchiwar and other Advocate - M.D.Sahare, Ku. M.K. Atmande
Vankatswami Satyam Ramteke
Adv. Ku. M.K. Atmande
Hearing History
Judge: 10-Jt. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC, Chamorshi
Disposed
Judgment
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 29-04-2026 | Judgment |
| 17-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 04-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 23-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Rajanna Payanna Yelkunchiwar Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Chamorshi acquitted both accused of wildlife protection and forest act violations. The court found the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt due to critical procedural failures in the search and seizure operation. Key Reasoning: The court rejected the prosecution's evidence because: (1) no independent witnesses were joined despite the incident occurring at a busy public location (Bus Stop, Ashti); (2) panch witnesses were forest officials, not independent civilians; (3) the seized chital skin was never produced in court or identified by expert examination; (4) the seizure panchnama was prepared at the forest office, not at the incident spot; and (5) insufficient evidence linked the second accused to the alleged offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Rajanna Payanna Yelkunchiwar Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Chamorshi acquitted both accused of wildlife protection and forest act violations. The court found the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt due to critical procedural failures in the search and seizure operation. Key Reasoning: The court rejected the prosecution's evidence because: (1) no independent witnesses were joined despite the incident occurring at a busy public location (Bus Stop, Ashti); (2) panch witnesses were forest officials, not independent civilians; (3) the seized chital skin was never produced in court or identified by expert examination; (4) the seizure panchnama was prepared at the forest office, not at the incident spot; and (5) insufficient evidence linked the second accused to the alleged offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts