Nikhil Ganesh Ghayal vs Nil — 1/2026

Case under Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act Section 8. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 20th March 2026.

Case disposed

Guardian Wards Case

CNR: MHBU200000052026

e-Filing Number

01-01-2026

Filing Number

2/2026

Filing Date

02-Jan-2026

Registration No

1/2026

Registration Date

02-Jan-2026

Court

District Court and Addl.Sessions Court, Mehkar

Judge

1-District Judge-1 and Additional Sess.Judge

Decision Date

20-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 20-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act Section 8

Guardians and Wards Act Section 29

Petitioner(s)

1.Nikhil Ganesh Ghayal

Adv. Davhale VB

Respondent(s)

1.Nil

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
20-Mar-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF

Court Decision Summary The Mehkar District Court allowed the application to sell agricultural land belonging to minor Nikhil Ghayal under sections 8 of the Hindu Minority and Guardian Act, 1956 and 29 of the Guardian and Wards Act. The court found that selling the inconvenient riverine land in Gut No. 13 and purchasing better quality adjacent land serves the minor's benefit and welfare, particularly to fund his higher education. The applicants were directed to reinvest the sale proceeds in purchasing new land in the minor's name within six months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
20-Mar-2026

Disposed

District Judge-1 and Additional Sess.Judge
11-Mar-2026

Arguments

District Judge-1 and Additional Sess.Judge
23-Feb-2026

Arguments

District Judge-1 and Additional Sess.Judge
05-Jan-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
02-Jan-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 1/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Mehkar District Court allowed the application to sell agricultural land belonging to minor Nikhil Ghayal under sections 8 of the Hindu Minority and Guardian Act, 1956 and 29 of the Guardian and Wards Act. The court found that selling the inconvenient riverine land in Gut No. 13 and purchasing better quality adjacent land serves the minor's benefit and welfare, particularly to fund his higher education. The applicants were directed to reinvest the sale proceeds in purchasing new land in the minor's name within six months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.