Prabhakar Damodhar Vaidya vs State of Maharashtra Advocate - DGP — 54/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 18th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln.
CNR: MHBU010003782026
e-Filing Number
27-02-2026
Filing Number
133/2026
Filing Date
27-02-2026
Registration No
54/2026
Registration Date
27-02-2026
Court
District and Session Court Buldhana
Judge
8-District Judge-2 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
48
Police Station
Dhad
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Prabhakar Damodhar Vaidya
Adv. Sawadatkar NP
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Advocate - DGP
Hearing History
Judge: 8-District Judge-2 & Additional Sess.Judge, Buldana.
Disposed
Order
Order
Order
Order
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 17-03-2026 | Order | |
| 16-03-2026 | Order | |
| 12-03-2026 | Order | |
| 10-03-2026 | Order |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge, Buldhana granted anticipatory bail to Prabhakar Damodhar Vaidya in Crime No. 48/2026, where he was accused of assault, extortion, and abusive language. The court approved his release on a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with a surety of equal amount, primarily because the investigation was substantially complete and the informant withdrew his complaint, expressing "no objection" to bail. Bail was conditioned upon weekly police station attendance, non-interference with witnesses, submission of identity documents, and furnishing details of blood relatives. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Additional Sessions Judge, Buldhana granted anticipatory bail to Prabhakar Damodhar Vaidya in Crime No. 48/2026, where he was accused of assault, extortion, and abusive language. The court approved his release on a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with a surety of equal amount, primarily because the investigation was substantially complete and the informant withdrew his complaint, expressing "no objection" to bail. Bail was conditioned upon weekly police station attendance, non-interference with witnesses, submission of identity documents, and furnishing details of blood relatives. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts