Limbaji s/o. Raybhan Rote vs Mahadev s/o. Devrao Yadav Advocate - Awasti R.V. — 67/2018
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 09th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHBI120003352018
Next Hearing
09th July 2026
Filing Number
121/2018
Filing Date
05-06-2018
Registration No
67/2018
Registration Date
05-06-2018
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Dharur
Judge
2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. JMFC DHARUR.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Limbaji s/o. Raybhan Rote
Adv. Munde N.M.
Chandrasen s/o. Bajirao Rote
Adv. Munde N.M.
Dinkar s/o. Bajirao Rote
Adv. Munde N.M.
Dadarao s/o. Kashinath Rote
Adv. Munde N.M.
Datta s/o. Dadarao Rote
Adv. Munde N.M.
1/1. Gorakh s/o Namdev Mathre
Adv. Munde N.M.
Respondent(s)
Mahadev s/o. Devrao Yadav Advocate - Awasti R.V.
Balasaheb s/o. Mahadev Yadav
Parwatibai s/o. Mahadev Yadav
Mahadev s/o. Sukhadev Rote
Adv. Munde N.M.
Govardhan s/o. Bhikaji Roate
Shantabai w/o. Bhikaji Rote
Laxman s/o. Suryakant Yadav
Devibai w/o. Suryakant Yadav
Shivhari s/o. Shankar Yadav
Digambar s/o. Dadarao Rote
Hearing History
Judge: 2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. JMFC DHARUR.
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 15-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 20-11-2025 | Evidence |
| 11-09-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
The petition filed by the plaintiff regarding a land boundary dispute (involving survey numbers 108/1 and 94) has been allowed. The court ordered the Taluka Land Records Inspector at Dharur to conduct a survey to demarcate the boundaries between the plaintiff's and defendants' properties, identify the common boundary, and submit a detailed report. The court found merit in the plaintiff's allegations of encroachment and obstruction by the defendants on the common access road and boundary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The petition filed by the plaintiff regarding a land boundary dispute (involving survey numbers 108/1 and 94) has been allowed. The court ordered the Taluka Land Records Inspector at Dharur to conduct a survey to demarcate the boundaries between the plaintiff's and defendants' properties, identify the common boundary, and submit a detailed report. The court found merit in the plaintiff's allegations of encroachment and obstruction by the defendants on the common access road and boundary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts