Kiran Lahu Zende vs Sharda Lahu Zende — 475/2025
Case under Hindu Succession Act Section 6. Status: Written Statement. Next hearing: 08th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHBI110023752025
Next Hearing
08th July 2026
e-Filing Number
07-07-2025
Filing Number
1088/2025
Filing Date
07-07-2025
Registration No
475/2025
Registration Date
08-07-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Georai
Judge
2-2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C. GEORAI
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kiran Lahu Zende
Adv. Dhondre A.P.
Respondent(s)
Sharda Lahu Zende
Anita Balu Borude
Swati Santosh Gaikwad
Jyoti Vikesh Waghmare
Shantabai Yada Zende
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C. GEORAI
Written Statement
Appearance
Appearance
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-04-2026 | Written Statement |
| 10-04-2026 | Appearance |
| 12-03-2026 | Appearance |
| 13-01-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 17-11-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Interim Orders
Summary: The compromise petition filed by both parties in a property partition case was rejected. The court found that the property in dispute is a Class-II agricultural property acquired by the deceased under the Ceiling Act, which cannot be partitioned without prior sanction from the Collector under Section 29 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961. Since the parties failed to obtain the requisite authority sanction, the compromise was deemed invalid and legally unenforceable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The compromise petition filed by both parties in a property partition case was rejected. The court found that the property in dispute is a Class-II agricultural property acquired by the deceased under the Ceiling Act, which cannot be partitioned without prior sanction from the Collector under Section 29 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961. Since the parties failed to obtain the requisite authority sanction, the compromise was deemed invalid and legally unenforceable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts