Vimalbai Radhakisan Sangale vs Tukaram Sundar Choure — 283/2023
Case under Partition Act Section 4. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHBI100012292023
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
e-Filing Number
26-06-2023
Filing Number
449/2023
Filing Date
30-06-2023
Registration No
283/2023
Registration Date
01-07-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Kaij
Judge
1-2ND JT. C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C. KAIJ
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vimalbai Radhakisan Sangale
Adv. Chincholkar N.M.
Respondent(s)
Tukaram Sundar Choure
Sudhamati Tukaram Choure
Navnath Tukaram Choure
Prabhakar Tukaram Choure
Baliram Tukaram Choure
Namdev Tukaram Choure
Sunanda Arjun Nagargoje
Sushala Baban Nagargoje
Sangita Chatrabhuj Bhange
Mirabai Pralhad Aghav
Hearing History
Judge: 1-2ND JT. C.J.J.D. AND J.M.F.C. KAIJ
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 12-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 20-02-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
| 16-01-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
| 12-12-2025 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY The petition to partition ancestral agricultural property (including mango and lime trees) was granted. The court found that the plaintiff established her rightful claim to an undivided share in the joint family property and that the balance of convenience favored her, dismissing the defendants' arguments that a prior partition deed and property transfer provisions provided adequate protection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY The petition to partition ancestral agricultural property (including mango and lime trees) was granted. The court found that the plaintiff established her rightful claim to an undivided share in the joint family property and that the balance of convenience favored her, dismissing the defendants' arguments that a prior partition deed and property transfer provisions provided adequate protection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts