Shriram Avdhoot Deshpande vs Satish Sureshrao Deshpande — 443/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section cpc. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHBI060027012023
Next Hearing
24th June 2026
Filing Number
1583/2023
Filing Date
26-10-2023
Registration No
443/2023
Registration Date
27-10-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division ,Ambajaogai
Judge
1-IInd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shriram Avdhoot Deshpande
Adv. Patky M.M.
Respondent(s)
Satish Sureshrao Deshpande
Balaji Vyankatrao Garad
Subhash Haribhau Deshpande
Pradip Haribhau Deshpande
Dilip Haribhau Deshpande
Sanjay Haribhau Deshpande
Suresh Avdhootrao Deshpande
Mahesh Subhashrao Deshpande Hivrekar
Ravindra Rameshrao Hivrekar Deshpande
Hearing History
Judge: 1-IInd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 19-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 18-11-2025 | Evidence |
| 19-09-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: In Regular Civil Suit No. 443/2023 (Shriram v/s. Satish), the court rejected the plaintiff's application seeking issuance of a commission to measure the suit property and fix boundaries. The court found the application premature and contrary to law and practice, as issues had not yet been settled and the plaintiff had not provided direct witness testimony. The plaintiff must prove his case on ownership and perpetual injunction through proper evidence at trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In Regular Civil Suit No. 443/2023 (Shriram v/s. Satish), the court rejected the plaintiff's application seeking issuance of a commission to measure the suit property and fix boundaries. The court found the application premature and contrary to law and practice, as issues had not yet been settled and the plaintiff had not provided direct witness testimony. The plaintiff must prove his case on ownership and perpetual injunction through proper evidence at trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts