Shriram Avdhoot Deshpande vs Satish Sureshrao Deshpande — 443/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section cpc. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHBI060027012023

Evidence

Next Hearing

24th June 2026

Filing Number

1583/2023

Filing Date

26-10-2023

Registration No

443/2023

Registration Date

27-10-2023

Court

Civil Court Junior Division ,Ambajaogai

Judge

1-IInd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section cpc

Petitioner(s)

Shriram Avdhoot Deshpande

Adv. Patky M.M.

Respondent(s)

Satish Sureshrao Deshpande

Balaji Vyankatrao Garad

Subhash Haribhau Deshpande

Pradip Haribhau Deshpande

Dilip Haribhau Deshpande

Sanjay Haribhau Deshpande

Suresh Avdhootrao Deshpande

Mahesh Subhashrao Deshpande Hivrekar

Ravindra Rameshrao Hivrekar Deshpande

Hearing History

Judge: 1-IInd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.

15-04-2026

Evidence

12-03-2026

Evidence

19-01-2026

Evidence

18-11-2025

Evidence

19-09-2025

Evidence

Interim Orders

14-03-2024
Order on Exhibit

Summary: In Regular Civil Suit No. 443/2023 (Shriram v/s. Satish), the court rejected the plaintiff's application seeking issuance of a commission to measure the suit property and fix boundaries. The court found the application premature and contrary to law and practice, as issues had not yet been settled and the plaintiff had not provided direct witness testimony. The plaintiff must prove his case on ownership and perpetual injunction through proper evidence at trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Regular Civil Suit No. 443/2023 (Shriram v/s. Satish), the court rejected the plaintiff's application seeking issuance of a commission to measure the suit property and fix boundaries. The court found the application premature and contrary to law and practice, as issues had not yet been settled and the plaintiff had not provided direct witness testimony. The plaintiff must prove his case on ownership and perpetual injunction through proper evidence at trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division ,Ambajaogai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case