Balkishan Shankarlal Tapde vs Karnamurti Gangadhar Salve — 175/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section cpc. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Ready. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHBI060010882023
Next Hearing
10th June 2026
Filing Number
702/2023
Filing Date
03-05-2023
Registration No
175/2023
Registration Date
04-05-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division ,Ambajaogai
Judge
1-IInd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Balkishan Shankarlal Tapde
Adv. Halkanche G.C.
Ashok Gopikishan Tapde
Suresh Gangabhishan Tapdiya
Respondent(s)
Karnamurti Gangadhar Salve
Hearing History
Judge: 1-IInd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ambajogai.
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
| 12-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
| 04-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
| 08-01-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
| 25-11-2025 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
Interim Orders
Summary The court dismissed the petitioner's plea (Order No. 5, dated 31/07/2023). The petitioner challenged a previous order that had granted possession of 40 acres of land to defendants (Plaintiff No. 1 and Vishnudas Tapde) based on a 1971 sale deed, arguing improper procedures and unauthorized transfer. However, the court found that the land sale deed was valid, the defendants had legitimate ownership and possession rights, and the petitioner failed to provide sufficient evidence to challenge the prior judgment. The court upheld the earlier order and dismissed the present petition with no costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court dismissed the petitioner's plea (Order No. 5, dated 31/07/2023). The petitioner challenged a previous order that had granted possession of 40 acres of land to defendants (Plaintiff No. 1 and Vishnudas Tapde) based on a 1971 sale deed, arguing improper procedures and unauthorized transfer. However, the court found that the land sale deed was valid, the defendants had legitimate ownership and possession rights, and the petitioner failed to provide sufficient evidence to challenge the prior judgment. The court upheld the earlier order and dismissed the present petition with no costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts