State of Maharashtra P.S. Shillegaon vs Manda Rambhau Zarekar Advocate - Sapkal G.D. — 1197/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 64,65(1),74,75(2),351(2),49,3(5). Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)

CNR: MHAU160047942025

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Next Hearing

18th June 2026

Filing Number

2440/2025

Filing Date

29-12-2025

Registration No

1197/2025

Registration Date

29-12-2025

Court

Gangapur Dist and Sessions Court

Judge

1-District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Gangapur

FIR Details

FIR Number

441

Police Station

SILLEGAON

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 64,65(1),74,75(2),351(2),49,3(5)
The Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012 Section 4,6,8,12,17
PROHIBITION OF CHILD MARRIAGE ACT Section 9,10,11
IA/1/2026 Classification : Bail Application Section State of Maharashtra P.S. ShillegaonPravin Chandrabhan Gore

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra P.S. Shillegaon

Adv. Ankush A.U.

Respondent(s)

Manda Rambhau Zarekar Advocate - Sapkal G.D.

Gajanan Rambhaji Zarekar

Pravin Chandrabhan Gore

Rekha Gautam Chavan

Kalpana Bhaskar More

Bhaskar Sajjan More

Latabai Chandrabhan Gore

Dadasaheb Chandrabhan Gore

Pranali Dadasaheb Gore

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge Gangapur

20-05-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

11-05-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

06-05-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

20-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

06-04-2026

Hearing Before Charge

Interim Orders

06-04-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Pravin Chandrabhan Gore (1197/2025) Accused Pravin Chandrabhan Gore's bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, was rejected. The court found prima facie evidence that Gore married a 15-year-old girl against her wishes and subsequently had non-consensual sexual intercourse with her. Although investigation was completed and a charge-sheet filed, the court deemed the offense serious and ruled that bail could not be granted solely on completion of investigation, citing risks of absconding and evidence tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Pravin Chandrabhan Gore (1197/2025) Accused Pravin Chandrabhan Gore's bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, was rejected. The court found prima facie evidence that Gore married a 15-year-old girl against her wishes and subsequently had non-consensual sexual intercourse with her. Although investigation was completed and a charge-sheet filed, the court deemed the offense serious and ruled that bail could not be granted solely on completion of investigation, citing risks of absconding and evidence tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Gangapur Dist and Sessions Court All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case