Shaikh Shahrukh Shaikh Sharif vs Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad Advocate - Mugdia R.P. — 66/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 39. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAU130000922025
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
e-Filing Number
13-11-2025
Filing Number
89/2025
Filing Date
13-11-2025
Registration No
66/2025
Registration Date
13-11-2025
Court
Corporation Court, Aurangabad
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE S.D., CORPORATION COURT, AURANGABAD
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shaikh Shahrukh Shaikh Sharif
Adv. Shaikh S.Q.
Respondent(s)
Municipal Corporation, Aurangabad Advocate - Mugdia R.P.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE S.D., CORPORATION COURT, AURANGABAD
Issues
Order on Exh
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
W.S. and Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-04-2026 | Issues |
| 01-04-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 30-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 25-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 12-03-2026 | W.S. and Say |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: RCS 66/2025 Shaikh Shahrukh sought temporary injunction to prevent Municipal Corporation Aurangabad from demolishing his mobile shop, claiming ₹1 crore investment and regular tax payments. The court rejected his application, finding he failed to establish a prima facie case after not producing required construction permission, sanctioned map, or completion certificate despite Corporation's notice dated 11.11.2025. Balance of convenience favored the Corporation's statutory demolition powers. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RCS 66/2025 Shaikh Shahrukh sought temporary injunction to prevent Municipal Corporation Aurangabad from demolishing his mobile shop, claiming ₹1 crore investment and regular tax payments. The court rejected his application, finding he failed to establish a prima facie case after not producing required construction permission, sanctioned map, or completion certificate despite Corporation's notice dated 11.11.2025. Balance of convenience favored the Corporation's statutory demolition powers. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts