Rajendra Yuvraj Borse vs Yuvraj Rajdhar Borse Advocate - Devgaya S.A. — 130/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,37(02),38. Status: Compliance. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAU120009892025
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
e-Filing Number
01-12-2025
Filing Number
459/2025
Filing Date
03-12-2025
Registration No
130/2025
Registration Date
03-12-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Soygaon
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. SOYGAON
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rajendra Yuvraj Borse
Adv. Mahajan R.S.
Respondent(s)
Yuvraj Rajdhar Borse Advocate - Devgaya S.A.
Shivaji Yuvraj Borse
Dattatrya Yuvraj Borse
Vijayabai Suresh Nikam
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. SOYGAON
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | Compliance |
| 29-04-2026 | Compliance |
| 20-04-2026 | Compliance |
| 15-04-2026 | Compliance |
| 13-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 130/2025 Petitioner: Rajendra Yuvraj Borse Respondents: Yuvraj Rajdhar Borse Advocate, Shivaji Yuvraj Borse, Dattatrya Yuvraj Borse Outcome: The petition was allowed. The court set aside the previous orders against respondents 1, 2, and 4, and granted the petitioner's application with costs of ₹400. The respondents are ordered to pay the costs to the petitioner. The court found that while the respondents' counsel cited illness as a reason for non-appearance, the requisite written response was not filed on record, necessitating the relief granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 130/2025 Petitioner: Rajendra Yuvraj Borse Respondents: Yuvraj Rajdhar Borse Advocate, Shivaji Yuvraj Borse, Dattatrya Yuvraj Borse Outcome: The petition was allowed. The court set aside the previous orders against respondents 1, 2, and 4, and granted the petitioner's application with costs of ₹400. The respondents are ordered to pay the costs to the petitioner. The court found that while the respondents' counsel cited illness as a reason for non-appearance, the requisite written response was not filed on record, necessitating the relief granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts