Sayyed Nasib Syyed Shamshoddin vs Rukhsar Sayyed Nasib Sayyed — 333/2022
Case under Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act Section 281(1). Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF OTHERWISE on 12th March 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAU080023402022
Filing Number
529/2022
Filing Date
12-Sep-2022
Registration No
333/2022
Registration Date
13-Sep-2022
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Sillod
Judge
4-Iind Jt.c.j.j.d. And J.m.f.c., Sillod
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF OTHERWISE
Last updated 29-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sayyed Nasib Syyed Shamshoddin
Adv. Tathe R.T.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Rukhsar Sayyed Nasib Sayyed
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court dismissed the suit filed by Sayyed Nasib against Rukhsar for default on March 12, 2026. The plaintiff and his advocate were repeatedly absent despite being called, and despite prior court directions on January 22 and February 11, 2026 to take effective steps to proceed. Given the 3-year-old suit's ineffectiveness and the plaintiff's apparent lack of interest in pursuing it, the Judicial Magistrate found dismissal warranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
Iind Jt.c.j.j.d. And J.m.f.c., Sillod
-
11-Feb-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
11-Feb-2026
Dismissal Order
Iind Jt.c.j.j.d. And J.m.f.c., Sillod
-
22-Jan-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
22-Jan-2026
Dismissal Order
Iind Jt.c.j.j.d. And J.m.f.c., Sillod
-
18-Dec-2025
Steps_Unready
Iind Jt.c.j.j.d. And J.m.f.c., Sillod
-
27-Oct-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Iind Jt.c.j.j.d. And J.m.f.c., Sillod
-
22-Sep-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Iind Jt.c.j.j.d. And J.m.f.c., Sillod
-
20-Aug-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Iind Jt.c.j.j.d. And J.m.f.c., Sillod
-
05-Jul-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod
-
05-May-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod
-
04-Mar-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod
-
18-Jan-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod
-
18-Dec-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod
-
16-Nov-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod
-
24-Sep-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod
-
17-Aug-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod
-
29-Jun-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod
-
19-Apr-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod
-
14-Mar-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Iiird Jt Cjjd And JMFC Sillod
-
01-Feb-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Iind Jt.c.j.j.d. And J.m.f.c., Sillod
-
19-Dec-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Iind Jt.c.j.j.d. And J.m.f.c., Sillod
-
21-Nov-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Iind Jt.c.j.j.d. And J.m.f.c., Sillod
-
09-Oct-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Iind Jt.c.j.j.d. And J.m.f.c., Sillod
-
19-Aug-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Iind Jt.c.j.j.d. And J.m.f.c., Sillod
-
17-Jul-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Iind Jt.c.j.j.d. And J.m.f.c., Sillod
-
22-Jun-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Iind Jt.c.j.j.d. And J.m.f.c., Sillod
-
03-May-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Iind Jt.c.j.j.d. And J.m.f.c., Sillod
-
15-Apr-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Iind Jt.c.j.j.d. And J.m.f.c., Sillod
-
09-Mar-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Iind Jt.c.j.j.d. And J.m.f.c., Sillod
-
04-Feb-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Iind Jt.c.j.j.d. And J.m.f.c., Sillod
-
09-Jan-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Iind Jt.c.j.j.d. And J.m.f.c., Sillod
-
08-Dec-2022
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Iind Jt.c.j.j.d. And J.m.f.c., Sillod
-
21-Nov-2022
W.S. and Say
Iind Jt.c.j.j.d. And J.m.f.c., Sillod
-
20-Oct-2022
W.S. and Say
Iind Jt.c.j.j.d. And J.m.f.c., Sillod
-
14-Sep-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Sep-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 333/2022
The court dismissed the suit filed by Sayyed Nasib against Rukhsar for default on March 12, 2026. The plaintiff and his advocate were repeatedly absent despite being called, and despite prior court directions on January 22 and February 11, 2026 to take effective steps to proceed. Given the 3-year-old suit's ineffectiveness and the plaintiff's apparent lack of interest in pursuing it, the Judicial Magistrate found dismissal warranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts