Sagar Ajay Sancheti(Legal Heir) vs Ajay Kantilal Sancheti Advocate - Katole N.H. — 35/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 8,34,37,38. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)

CNR: MHAU050047692025

Evidence

Next Hearing

19th June 2026

e-Filing Number

17-10-2025

Filing Number

2931/2025

Filing Date

17-10-2025

Registration No

35/2025

Registration Date

17-10-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Vaijapur

Judge

5-JT CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION AND ADDL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VAIJAPUR

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 8,34,37,38
CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section Order39Rule1and2r/wSec.151

Petitioner(s)

Sagar Ajay Sancheti(Legal Heir)

Adv. ABHAY BHARAT PRADHAN

Respondent(s)

Ajay Kantilal Sancheti Advocate - Katole N.H.

Akash s/o Ajay Sancheti

Surekha w/o Ajay Sancheti

Premsing s/o Gulabsing Rajput

Shaikh Navaz s/o Majid Shaikh

Nagar urban Co-op Bank Ltd Ahmednagar

Nayan Enterprises Prop Vaishali Ashok Desarda

Hearing History

Judge: 5-JT CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION AND ADDL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VAIJAPUR

22-04-2026

Evidence

17-03-2026

Evidence

12-03-2026

Evidence

05-03-2026

Evidence

21-02-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

17-03-2026
Order on T.I.

Case Summary: Sagar Ajay Sancheti v. Ajay Kantilal Sancheti (Spl. C.S. No. 35/2025) The court rejected the plaintiff's second application for temporary injunction against defendant No.6 (a bank). The plaintiff sought to restrain the bank from taking possession of property mortgaged by defendant No.3 on 13.12.2016, claiming he held an undivided share as a legal heir. The court found the plaintiff failed to establish a prima-facie case, that balance of convenience did not favor him, and he would not suffer irreparable loss. The court noted the 10-year delay in filing suit, suspicious circumstances regarding the plaintiff's identity and representation, and evidence that defendant No.3 was the full owner with legal right to mortgage the property under the Hindu Succession Act. The earlier interim order against defendants 1-3 remains unchanged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Sagar Ajay Sancheti v. Ajay Kantilal Sancheti (Spl. C.S. No. 35/2025) The court rejected the plaintiff's second application for temporary injunction against defendant No.6 (a bank). The plaintiff sought to restrain the bank from taking possession of property mortgaged by defendant No.3 on 13.12.2016, claiming he held an undivided share as a legal heir. The court found the plaintiff failed to establish a prima-facie case, that balance of convenience did not favor him, and he would not suffer irreparable loss. The court noted the 10-year delay in filing suit, suspicious circumstances regarding the plaintiff's identity and representation, and evidence that defendant No.3 was the full owner with legal right to mortgage the property under the Hindu Succession Act. The earlier interim order against defendants 1-3 remains unchanged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court, Vaijapur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case