Sagar Ajay Sancheti(Legal Heir) vs Ajay Kantilal Sancheti Advocate - Katole N.H. — 35/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 8,34,37,38. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Special Civil Suit (Senior Division Judge)
CNR: MHAU050047692025
Next Hearing
19th June 2026
e-Filing Number
17-10-2025
Filing Number
2931/2025
Filing Date
17-10-2025
Registration No
35/2025
Registration Date
17-10-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Vaijapur
Judge
5-JT CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION AND ADDL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VAIJAPUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sagar Ajay Sancheti(Legal Heir)
Adv. ABHAY BHARAT PRADHAN
Respondent(s)
Ajay Kantilal Sancheti Advocate - Katole N.H.
Akash s/o Ajay Sancheti
Surekha w/o Ajay Sancheti
Premsing s/o Gulabsing Rajput
Shaikh Navaz s/o Majid Shaikh
Nagar urban Co-op Bank Ltd Ahmednagar
Nayan Enterprises Prop Vaishali Ashok Desarda
Hearing History
Judge: 5-JT CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION AND ADDL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VAIJAPUR
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 17-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 05-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 21-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Sagar Ajay Sancheti v. Ajay Kantilal Sancheti (Spl. C.S. No. 35/2025) The court rejected the plaintiff's second application for temporary injunction against defendant No.6 (a bank). The plaintiff sought to restrain the bank from taking possession of property mortgaged by defendant No.3 on 13.12.2016, claiming he held an undivided share as a legal heir. The court found the plaintiff failed to establish a prima-facie case, that balance of convenience did not favor him, and he would not suffer irreparable loss. The court noted the 10-year delay in filing suit, suspicious circumstances regarding the plaintiff's identity and representation, and evidence that defendant No.3 was the full owner with legal right to mortgage the property under the Hindu Succession Act. The earlier interim order against defendants 1-3 remains unchanged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Sagar Ajay Sancheti v. Ajay Kantilal Sancheti (Spl. C.S. No. 35/2025) The court rejected the plaintiff's second application for temporary injunction against defendant No.6 (a bank). The plaintiff sought to restrain the bank from taking possession of property mortgaged by defendant No.3 on 13.12.2016, claiming he held an undivided share as a legal heir. The court found the plaintiff failed to establish a prima-facie case, that balance of convenience did not favor him, and he would not suffer irreparable loss. The court noted the 10-year delay in filing suit, suspicious circumstances regarding the plaintiff's identity and representation, and evidence that defendant No.3 was the full owner with legal right to mortgage the property under the Hindu Succession Act. The earlier interim order against defendants 1-3 remains unchanged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts