Arti Nitesh Rathod vs Nitesh Mahadeo Rathod — 255/2023
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12, 18, 19, 20, 22, 23. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.
Cri.M.A.
CNR: MHAK100010142023
Next Hearing
16th April 2026
Filing Number
857/2023
Filing Date
22-08-2023
Registration No
255/2023
Registration Date
22-08-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Patur
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. Patur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Arti Nitesh Rathod
Adv. Bharati Rajesh Deshmukh
Respondent(s)
Nitesh Mahadeo Rathod
Devkabai Mahadeo Rathod
Mahadeo Keshav Rathod
Manoj Mahadeo Rathod
Archana Manoj Rathod
Sonu Tufan Ade
Tufan Sangram Ade
Kalinda Ade
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. Patur
Evidence
Evidence
Order on Exh
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 19-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 04-12-2025 | Order on Exh |
| 10-11-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 03-10-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Arti Nitesh Rathod v. Nitesh Mahadeo Rathod (Cri.M.A./255/2023) The petition under the Domestic Violence Act, 2005 was partially allowed. The court granted the petitioner (wife) interim relief of Rs. 3,000 per month for maintenance and directed the respondent to provide shelter arrangements worth Rs. 1,000 per month. The court found sufficient evidence of domestic violence including physical and emotional abuse, and ordered the respondent to cease harassment while allowing the petitioner to reside separately. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Arti Nitesh Rathod v. Nitesh Mahadeo Rathod (Cri.M.A./255/2023) The petition under the Domestic Violence Act, 2005 was partially allowed. The court granted the petitioner (wife) interim relief of Rs. 3,000 per month for maintenance and directed the respondent to provide shelter arrangements worth Rs. 1,000 per month. The court found sufficient evidence of domestic violence including physical and emotional abuse, and ordered the respondent to cease harassment while allowing the petitioner to reside separately. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts