Arti Nitesh Rathod vs Nitesh Mahadeo Rathod — 255/2023

Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12, 18, 19, 20, 22, 23. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 16-Apr-2026 this date has passed

Cri.M.A.

CNR: MHAK100010142023

Filing Number

857/2023

Filing Date

22-Aug-2023

Registration No

255/2023

Registration Date

22-Aug-2023

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Patur

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. Patur

Last updated 25-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12, 18, 19, 20, 22, 23

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Arti Nitesh Rathod

    Adv. Bharati Rajesh Deshmukh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Nitesh Mahadeo Rathod

  2. 2.Devkabai Mahadeo Rathod

  3. 3.Mahadeo Keshav Rathod

  4. 4.Manoj Mahadeo Rathod

  5. 5.Archana Manoj Rathod

  6. 6.Sonu Tufan Ade

  7. 7.Tufan Sangram Ade

  8. 8.Kalinda Ade

Case History

  1. 16-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  3. 19-Jan-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary Arti Nitesh Rathod v. Nitesh Mahadeo Rathod (Cri.M.A./255/2023) The petition under the Domestic Violence Act, 2005 was partially allowed. The court granted the petitioner (wife) interim relief of Rs. 3,000 per month for maintenance and directed the respondent to provide shelter arrangements worth Rs. 1,000 per month. The court found sufficient evidence of domestic violence including physical and emotional abuse, and ordered the respondent to cease harassment while allowing the petitioner to reside separately. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 19-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  5. 04-Dec-2025

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  6. 10-Nov-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  7. 03-Oct-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  8. 29-Aug-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  9. 31-Jul-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  10. 04-Jun-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  11. 23-May-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  12. 21-Apr-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  13. 21-Apr-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  14. 17-Mar-2025

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  15. 28-Feb-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

  16. 15-Feb-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

  17. 14-Jan-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

  18. 19-Dec-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

  19. 13-Dec-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

  20. 16-Nov-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

  21. 08-Oct-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

  22. 09-Sep-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

  23. 30-Aug-2024

    Reply/Say

  24. 08-Aug-2024

    Reply/Say

  25. 19-Jul-2024

    Reply/Say

  26. 27-Jun-2024

    Reply/Say

  27. 11-Jun-2024

    Reply/Say

  28. 30-Apr-2024

    Reply/Say

  29. 16-Apr-2024

    Written Statement

  30. 21-Mar-2024

    Written Statement

  31. 29-Feb-2024

    Written Statement

  32. 08-Feb-2024

    Written Statement

  33. 01-Feb-2024

    Written Statement

  34. 19-Jan-2024

    Written Statement

  35. 20-Dec-2023

    Awaiting Notice

  36. 21-Nov-2023

    Awaiting Notice

  37. 17-Oct-2023

    Awaiting Notice

  38. 16-Sep-2023

    Awaiting Notice

  39. 25-Aug-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  40. 22-Aug-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 255/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Arti Nitesh Rathod v. Nitesh Mahadeo Rathod (Cri.M.A./255/2023) The petition under the Domestic Violence Act, 2005 was partially allowed. The court granted the petitioner (wife) interim relief of Rs. 3,000 per month for maintenance and directed the respondent to provide shelter arrangements worth Rs. 1,000 per month. The court found sufficient evidence of domestic violence including physical and emotional abuse, and ordered the respondent to cease harassment while allowing the petitioner to reside separately. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case