Gajanan Sidaji Bochare vs The Secretary Gram Panchayat shirla Advocate - Mankar Mohan Anandrao — 1000019/2015
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 11. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHAK100002342015
Filing Number
1000033/2015
Filing Date
01-Apr-2015
Registration No
1000019/2015
Registration Date
01-Apr-2015
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Patur
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. Patur
Last updated 25-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Gajanan Sidaji Bochare
Adv. Quazi Amjad Ali Sarfaraj Ali
-
2.Ganesh Sidaji bochare
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Secretary Gram Panchayat shirla Advocate - Mankar Mohan Anandrao
-
2.ramesh Narayan Andhare
Case History
-
10-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge J.D. Patur
-
22-Jan-2026
Additional W.S.
Civil Judge J.D. Patur
-
05-Dec-2025
Order on Exh
Civil Judge J.D. Patur
-
31-Oct-2025
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Civil Judge J.D. Patur
-
18-Sep-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge J.D. Patur
-
25-Jul-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge J.D. Patur
-
21-Jun-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge J.D. Patur
-
04-Apr-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge J.D. Patur
-
21-Feb-2025
Evidence Part Heard
-
17-Jan-2025
Evidence Part Heard
-
06-Dec-2024
Evidence Part Heard
-
25-Oct-2024
Evidence Part Heard
-
20-Sep-2024
Evidence Part Heard
-
22-Aug-2024
Evidence Part Heard
-
18-Jul-2024
Evidence Part Heard
-
28-Jun-2024
Evidence Part Heard
-
03-May-2024
Evidence Part Heard
-
05-Apr-2024
Evidence Part Heard
-
14-Mar-2024
Evidence Part Heard
-
09-Feb-2024
Evidence Part Heard
-
12-Jan-2024
Evidence Part Heard
-
07-Dec-2023
Evidence Part Heard
-
20-Oct-2023
Evidence Part Heard
-
15-Sep-2023
Evidence Part Heard
-
04-Aug-2023
Evidence Part Heard
-
23-Jun-2023
Evidence Part Heard
-
15-Apr-2023
Evidence Part Heard
-
03-Mar-2023
Evidence Part Heard
-
03-Feb-2023
Evidence Part Heard
-
06-Jan-2023
Evidence Part Heard
-
29-Nov-2022
Evidence Part Heard
-
14-Oct-2022
Evidence Part Heard
-
02-Sep-2022
Evidence Part Heard
-
15-Jul-2022
Evidence Part Heard
-
10-Jun-2022
Evidence Part Heard
-
25-Mar-2022
Evidence
-
18-Feb-2022
Evidence
-
21-Jan-2022
Evidence
-
11-Dec-2021
Evidence
-
10-Dec-2021
Evidence
-
13-Nov-2021
Evidence
-
29-Oct-2021
Evidence
-
01-Oct-2021
Evidence
-
03-Sep-2021
Evidence
-
21-Aug-2021
Evidence
-
31-Jul-2021
Evidence
-
09-Jul-2021
Evidence
-
10-Jun-2021
Evidence
-
09-Apr-2021
Evidence
-
12-Mar-2021
Evidence
-
25-Feb-2021
Evidence
-
10-Feb-2021
Evidence
-
25-Jan-2021
Evidence
-
31-Dec-2020
Evidence
-
05-Nov-2020
Evidence
-
05-Sep-2020
Evidence
-
03-Aug-2020
Evidence
-
03-Jul-2020
Evidence
-
17-Apr-2020
Evidence
-
12-Mar-2020
Evidence
-
24-Feb-2020
Evidence
-
21-Feb-2020
Evidence
-
17-Jan-2020
Evidence
-
19-Dec-2019
Evidence
-
29-Nov-2019
Evidence
-
24-Oct-2019
Evidence
-
20-Sep-2019
Evidence
-
22-Aug-2019
Evidence
-
22-Jul-2019
Evidence
-
28-Jun-2019
Evidence
-
20-Apr-2019
Evidence
-
18-Apr-2019
Evidence
-
15-Mar-2019
Evidence
-
17-Jan-2019
Evidence
-
15-Nov-2018
Evidence
-
12-Oct-2018
Evidence
-
10-Aug-2018
Evidence
-
28-Jun-2018
Evidence
-
06-Apr-2018
Evidence
-
29-Mar-2018
Evidence
-
09-Mar-2018
Evidence
-
08-Feb-2018
Evidence
-
06-Jan-2018
Evidence
-
16-Dec-2017
Evidence
-
08-Dec-2017
Evidence
-
18-Nov-2017
Evidence
-
22-Sep-2017
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case R.C.S. No. 19/2015 - Gajanan Vs. Secretary (Order dated 22.09.2017) The court allowed the amendment application filed by Defendant No. 2 under Order 6 Rule 17 of CPC to clarify the property boundary description. The court found the amendment to be just and reasonable, material to determining the real question in controversy, and determined it would not change the nature of the suit or cause substantial prejudice to the plaintiff. Defendant No. 2 was directed to carry out the amendment by the next date of hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-Sep-2017
Evidence
-
08-Sep-2017
Evidence
-
04-Aug-2017
Evidence
-
20-Jul-2017
Evidence
-
15-Jun-2017
Evidence
Civil Judge J.D. Patur
-
09-Mar-2017
Evidence
Civil Judge J.D. Patur
-
12-Jan-2017
Evidence
Civil Judge J.D. Patur
-
18-Nov-2016
Evidence
Civil Judge J.D. Patur
-
14-Oct-2016
Evidence
Civil Judge J.D. Patur
-
17-Sep-2016
Issues
Civil Judge J.D. Patur
-
05-Aug-2016
Issues
Civil Judge J.D. Patur
-
15-Jul-2016
Issues
Civil Judge J.D. Patur
-
18-Jun-2016
Issues
Civil Judge J.D. Patur
-
01-Apr-2016
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge J.D. Patur
-
25-Feb-2016
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge J.D. Patur
-
12-Feb-2016
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge J.D. Patur
-
22-Jan-2016
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge J.D. Patur
-
26-Nov-2015
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge J.D. Patur
-
13-Aug-2015
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge J.D. Patur
-
12-Jun-2015
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge J.D. Patur
-
30-Apr-2015
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge J.D. Patur
-
20-Apr-2015
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge J.D. Patur
-
07-Apr-2015
First Order
Civil Judge J.D. Patur
-
06-Apr-2015
First Order
Civil Judge J.D. Patur
-
02-Apr-2015
First Order
Civil Judge J.D. Patur
-
01-Apr-2015
First Order
Civil Judge J.D. Patur
-
01-Apr-2015
Case filed
Registration No. 1000019/2015
-
01-Jan-2003
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
Case R.C.S. No. 19/2015 - Gajanan Vs. Secretary (Order dated 22.09.2017) The court allowed the amendment application filed by Defendant No. 2 under Order 6 Rule 17 of CPC to clarify the property boundary description. The court found the amendment to be just and reasonable, material to determining the real question in controversy, and determined it would not change the nature of the suit or cause substantial prejudice to the plaintiff. Defendant No. 2 was directed to carry out the amendment by the next date of hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts