Pooja Vaibhav Tidke/Pooja Rajendra Tipre vs Vaibhav Kishor Tidke — 207/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section APPLICATIONUNDERSECTION144OFBNSS. Status: Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.

Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready Next hearing 27-Mar-2026 this date has passed

Cri.M.A.

CNR: MHAK090022902025

e-Filing Number

06-10-2025

Filing Number

1815/2025

Filing Date

08-Oct-2025

Registration No

207/2025

Registration Date

09-Oct-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Murtijapur

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

Last updated 25-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section APPLICATIONUNDERSECTION144OFBNSS

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Pooja Vaibhav Tidke/Pooja Rajendra Tipre

    Adv. MATE KISHOR NANASAHEB

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vaibhav Kishor Tidke

Case History

  1. 27-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  3. 16-Feb-2026

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  4. 19-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  5. 20-Dec-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    In a maintenance petition under Section 144 of BNSS filed by Pooja against Vaibhav, the court found that notice was properly served via RPAD on 20.12.2025 (marked "Not claimed"), establishing due service despite earlier failed attempts. The case was ordered to proceed ex-parte against the non-applicant (Vaibhav) due to his refusal to accept the notice despite knowledge thereof. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 20-Dec-2025

    Documents

    Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  7. 19-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 08-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 207/2025

casestatus.in Summary

In a maintenance petition under Section 144 of BNSS filed by Pooja against Vaibhav, the court found that notice was properly served via RPAD on 20.12.2025 (marked "Not claimed"), establishing due service despite earlier failed attempts. The case was ordered to proceed ex-parte against the non-applicant (Vaibhav) due to his refusal to accept the notice despite knowledge thereof. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case