Sachin Suresh Dayama vs sachin nandkishor yutkar Advocate - Aherkar Mohan P. — 5/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O4,R2. Status: Awaiting Notice. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.

Spl.C.S. - Spl.Civ.Suit

CNR: MHAK060001712026

Awaiting Notice

Next Hearing

10th April 2026

e-Filing Number

17-01-2026

Filing Number

62/2026

Filing Date

17-01-2026

Registration No

5/2026

Registration Date

19-01-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Akot

Judge

26-Civil Judge Sr.Dn. Akot

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O4,R2

Petitioner(s)

Sachin Suresh Dayama

Adv. Vishal Suresh Tatar

Respondent(s)

sachin nandkishor yutkar Advocate - Aherkar Mohan P.

shamal nandkishor yutkar

Purushottam rupanchand yutkar

Harshal purushottam yutkar

Brancha managaer

Branch Manager Equitas small finances

Hearing History

Judge: 26-Civil Judge Sr.Dn. Akot

07-03-2026

Awaiting Notice

06-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Ready

27-02-2026

Argument on Exh.____Ready

13-02-2026

Argument on Exh.____Ready

06-02-2026

Hearing

Interim Orders

07-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary Both temporary injunction applications (Exh.5 and 10) were allowed by the Civil Judge on March 7, 2026. Defendants Nos. 1-4 and 7 are temporarily restrained from creating any third-party interest in the suit property. The court found the plaintiff established a prima-facie case under a valid agreement to sale dated August 29, 2025, with balance of convenience favoring the plaintiff, and granted the injunction to prevent further alienation of the mortgaged property during the specific performance suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary Both temporary injunction applications (Exh.5 and 10) were allowed by the Civil Judge on March 7, 2026. Defendants Nos. 1-4 and 7 are temporarily restrained from creating any third-party interest in the suit property. The court found the plaintiff established a prima-facie case under a valid agreement to sale dated August 29, 2025, with balance of convenience favoring the plaintiff, and granted the injunction to prevent further alienation of the mortgaged property during the specific performance suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Akot All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case