Imran Khan Yasin Khan vs State of Maharashtra Through P.S.O. P.S. City Kotwali Akola. Advocate - APP — 126/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 10th March 2026.

Cri.Bail Appln.

CNR: MHAK010008032026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

18-02-2026

Filing Number

347/2026

Filing Date

18-02-2026

Registration No

126/2026

Registration Date

18-02-2026

Court

District and Session Court , Akola

Judge

2-District Judge -I Akola

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 77,75(1)(3),76,64,3(5)

Petitioner(s)

Imran Khan Yasin Khan

Adv. Dildar Khan

Respondent(s)

State of Maharashtra Through P.S.O. P.S. City Kotwali Akola. Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Hearing History

Judge: 2-District Judge -I Akola

10-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

Order

06-03-2026

Hearing

05-03-2026

Hearing

26-02-2026

Reply/Say

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary The court rejected Imran Khan Yasin Khan's bail application in a serious sexual exploitation case. The Additional Sessions Judge found that the allegations against him were grave—he attempted to establish sexual relations with the victim as part of a coordinated criminal conspiracy with the main accused Raheman to sexually and economically exploit her. The court determined that his voluntary participation in this sinister plan, evidenced by accompanying Raheman to the victim's home, constituted clear culpability beyond mere demand and refusal, making bail inappropriate given the serious nature of charges and ongoing investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court rejected Imran Khan Yasin Khan's bail application in a serious sexual exploitation case. The Additional Sessions Judge found that the allegations against him were grave—he attempted to establish sexual relations with the victim as part of a coordinated criminal conspiracy with the main accused Raheman to sexually and economically exploit her. The court determined that his voluntary participation in this sinister plan, evidenced by accompanying Raheman to the victim's home, constituted clear culpability beyond mere demand and refusal, making bail inappropriate given the serious nature of charges and ongoing investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Court , Akola All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case