Jalindar Sawata Khamkar vs State of Maharashtra through District Collector Ahilyanagar — 76/2026
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38,. Status: W.S. and Say. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAH230001952026
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
e-Filing Number
05-03-2026
Filing Number
199/2026
Filing Date
06-03-2026
Registration No
76/2026
Registration Date
07-03-2026
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Shrigonda
Judge
5-Jt. Civil Judge S. D. Shrigonda
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Jalindar Sawata Khamkar
Adv. DESHMUKH AJIT PRATAPRAO
Sahebrao Sawata Khamkar
Adv. DESHMUKH AJIT PRATAPRAO
Tushar Sahebrao Khamkar
Adv. DESHMUKH AJIT PRATAPRAO
Subhash Popat Khamkar
Adv. DESHMUKH AJIT PRATAPRAO
Rohini Subhash Khamkar
Adv. DESHMUKH AJIT PRATAPRAO
Shalini Sanjay Sidankar
Adv. DESHMUKH AJIT PRATAPRAO
Aadityaraj Santosh Raykar M/G Jyoti Santosh Raykar
Adv. DESHMUKH AJIT PRATAPRAO
Vishal Santosh Raykar MG Jyoti Santosh Raykar
Adv. DESHMUKH AJIT PRATAPRAO
Jyoti Santosh Raykar
Adv. DESHMUKH AJIT PRATAPRAO
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra through District Collector Ahilyanagar
Tahsildar Saheb Shrigonda
Chief Executive Officer Z P Ahilyanagar
Deputy Engineer Z P Public Work Sub Division Shrigonda
Kishor Shahidas Thite
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Jt. Civil Judge S. D. Shrigonda
W.S. and Say
Awaiting Notice
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | W.S. and Say | |
| 09-03-2026 | Awaiting Notice |
Interim Orders
The court dismissed the defendant's application seeking relief regarding illegal road-widening work on the disputed property, finding that the road-widening work was sanctioned by proper authority and the application lacked merit. The court directed both parties to maintain the status quo of the property and ordered the defendant to file a suit if aggrieved, while directing the plaintiff to file a common affidavit with the defendant's reply affidavit as per the prescribed procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court dismissed the defendant's application seeking relief regarding illegal road-widening work on the disputed property, finding that the road-widening work was sanctioned by proper authority and the application lacked merit. The court directed both parties to maintain the status quo of the property and ordered the defendant to file a suit if aggrieved, while directing the plaintiff to file a common affidavit with the defendant's reply affidavit as per the prescribed procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts