Jalindar Sawata Khamkar vs State of Maharashtra through District Collector Ahilyanagar — 76/2026

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: W.S. and Say. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.

W.S. and Say Next hearing 09-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHAH230001952026

e-Filing Number

05-03-2026

Filing Number

199/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

76/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Senior Division, Shrigonda

Judge

5-Jt. Civil Judge S. D. Shrigonda

Last updated 14-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 38

Petitioner(s)

1.Jalindar Sawata Khamkar

Adv. DESHMUKH AJIT PRATAPRAO
2.Sahebrao Sawata Khamkar

Adv. DESHMUKH AJIT PRATAPRAO
3.Tushar Sahebrao Khamkar

Adv. DESHMUKH AJIT PRATAPRAO
4.Subhash Popat Khamkar

Adv. DESHMUKH AJIT PRATAPRAO
5.Rohini Subhash Khamkar

Adv. DESHMUKH AJIT PRATAPRAO
6.Shalini Sanjay Sidankar

Adv. DESHMUKH AJIT PRATAPRAO
7.Aadityaraj Santosh Raykar M/G Jyoti Santosh Raykar

Adv. DESHMUKH AJIT PRATAPRAO
8.Vishal Santosh Raykar MG Jyoti Santosh Raykar

Adv. DESHMUKH AJIT PRATAPRAO
9.Jyoti Santosh Raykar

Adv. DESHMUKH AJIT PRATAPRAO

Respondent(s)

1.State of Maharashtra through District Collector Ahilyanagar
2.Tahsildar Saheb Shrigonda
3.Chief Executive Officer Z P Ahilyanagar
4.Deputy Engineer Z P Public Work Sub Division Shrigonda
5.Kishor Shahidas Thite

Case History

09-Jun-2026

Next hearingPending
08-Apr-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF

The court dismissed the defendant's application seeking relief regarding illegal road-widening work on the disputed property, finding that the road-widening work was sanctioned by proper authority and the application lacked merit. The court directed both parties to maintain the status quo of the property and ordered the defendant to file a suit if aggrieved, while directing the plaintiff to file a common affidavit with the defendant's reply affidavit as per the prescribed procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
08-Apr-2026

W.S. and Say

Jt. Civil Judge S. D. Shrigonda
09-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
06-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 76/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the defendant's application seeking relief regarding illegal road-widening work on the disputed property, finding that the road-widening work was sanctioned by proper authority and the application lacked merit. The court directed both parties to maintain the status quo of the property and ordered the defendant to file a suit if aggrieved, while directing the plaintiff to file a common affidavit with the defendant's reply affidavit as per the prescribed procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.