The State of Maharashtra through Rahuri Police Station vs Nitin Pandharinath Mhase — 383/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 435,34,. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 09th March 2026.

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHAH180017332024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

09-07-2024

Filing Number

1402/2024

Filing Date

09-07-2024

Registration No

383/2024

Registration Date

10-07-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Rahuri

Judge

2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC

Decision Date

09th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

592

Police Station

RAHURI POLICE STATION

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 435,34,

Petitioner(s)

The State of Maharashtra through Rahuri Police Station

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Nitin Pandharinath Mhase

Vishal Nitin Mhase

Hearing History

Judge: 2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC

09-03-2026

Disposed

17-02-2026

Arguments

06-11-2025

Awaiting Summons

07-10-2025

Awaiting Summons

24-06-2025

Awaiting Summons

Final Orders / Judgements

09-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary In Criminal Case No. 383/2024, the First Class Judicial Magistrate Court in Rahuri acquitted both accused Nitin Pandharinath Mhase and Vishal Nitin Mhase of charges under IPC Sections 435 and 34 (burning property causing loss) on March 9, 2026. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused intentionally set fire to the complainant's sugarcane field on May 15, 2024, as the complainant and sole witness later settled their dispute (Section 21 settlement) and could not provide credible evidence supporting the charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

17-02-2026
Evidence
17-02-2026
Charge
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary In Criminal Case No. 383/2024, the First Class Judicial Magistrate Court in Rahuri acquitted both accused Nitin Pandharinath Mhase and Vishal Nitin Mhase of charges under IPC Sections 435 and 34 (burning property causing loss) on March 9, 2026. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused intentionally set fire to the complainant's sugarcane field on May 15, 2024, as the complainant and sole witness later settled their dispute (Section 21 settlement) and could not provide credible evidence supporting the charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Rahuri All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case