The State of Maharashtra through Rahuri Police Station vs Nitin Pandharinath Mhase — 383/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 435,34,. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 09th March 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHAH180017332024
e-Filing Number
09-07-2024
Filing Number
1402/2024
Filing Date
09-07-2024
Registration No
383/2024
Registration Date
10-07-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Rahuri
Judge
2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
592
Police Station
RAHURI POLICE STATION
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra through Rahuri Police Station
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Nitin Pandharinath Mhase
Vishal Nitin Mhase
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. And JMFC
Disposed
Arguments
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 17-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 06-11-2025 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 07-10-2025 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 24-06-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary In Criminal Case No. 383/2024, the First Class Judicial Magistrate Court in Rahuri acquitted both accused Nitin Pandharinath Mhase and Vishal Nitin Mhase of charges under IPC Sections 435 and 34 (burning property causing loss) on March 9, 2026. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused intentionally set fire to the complainant's sugarcane field on May 15, 2024, as the complainant and sole witness later settled their dispute (Section 21 settlement) and could not provide credible evidence supporting the charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary In Criminal Case No. 383/2024, the First Class Judicial Magistrate Court in Rahuri acquitted both accused Nitin Pandharinath Mhase and Vishal Nitin Mhase of charges under IPC Sections 435 and 34 (burning property causing loss) on March 9, 2026. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused intentionally set fire to the complainant's sugarcane field on May 15, 2024, as the complainant and sole witness later settled their dispute (Section 21 settlement) and could not provide credible evidence supporting the charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts