Dattatray Narayan Kurhat vs Bhausaheb Sitaram Zine Advocate - Zaware B. G. — 362/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 36,38. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAH140005682025
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
e-Filing Number
07-04-2025
Filing Number
616/2025
Filing Date
07-04-2025
Registration No
362/2025
Registration Date
09-04-2025
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Newasa
Judge
3-2nd Jt. CJJD and JMFC, Newasa
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dattatray Narayan Kurhat
Adv. Pathan K. H.
Vanita Dattatray Kurhat
Adv. PATHAN KHALILAHMEDKHAN HIDAYATKHAN
Respondent(s)
Bhausaheb Sitaram Zine Advocate - Zaware B. G.
Hearing History
Judge: 3-2nd Jt. CJJD and JMFC, Newasa
Issues
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Issues | |
| 20-03-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 16-03-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 09-03-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 23-02-2026 | Order on Exh |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case: Dattatray Narayan Kurhat & Ors. vs. Bhausaheb Sitaram Zine & Ors. (RCS No. 362/2025) Outcome: Temporary injunction granted. The court restrained the defendants from creating third-party interests or transferring the agricultural property in Malichinchora, Ahmednagar, until final disposal of the suit. The plaintiff established a prima facie case of an agreement to sell dated 06/10/2008 with possession already delivered, and the court found balance of convenience and risk of irreparable loss favored granting the injunction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case: Dattatray Narayan Kurhat & Ors. vs. Bhausaheb Sitaram Zine & Ors. (RCS No. 362/2025) Outcome: Temporary injunction granted. The court restrained the defendants from creating third-party interests or transferring the agricultural property in Malichinchora, Ahmednagar, until final disposal of the suit. The plaintiff established a prima facie case of an agreement to sell dated 06/10/2008 with possession already delivered, and the court found balance of convenience and risk of irreparable loss favored granting the injunction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts