Akshay Shankar Khandagale vs Sachin Bhausaheb Gadhe Advocate - Dhere K. S. — 228/2024
Case under Specific Relief (amendment) Act Section 36,37,38,39. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAH140003582024
Next Hearing
17th April 2026
e-Filing Number
03-03-2024
Filing Number
317/2024
Filing Date
04-03-2024
Registration No
228/2024
Registration Date
07-03-2024
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Newasa
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Akshay Shankar Khandagale
Adv. Shaikh Shadab R.
Meena Shankar Khandagale
Adv. Shaikh Shadab R.
Ramdas Shankar Khandagale
Adv. shaikh shadab
Vaishali Navnath Mate
Adv. Shaikh Shadab R.
Alka Shankar Khandagale
Adv. Shaikh Shadab R.
Dnyaneshwar Rakhmaji Khandagale
Adv. Shaikh Shadab R.
Respondent(s)
Sachin Bhausaheb Gadhe Advocate - Dhere K. S.
Kishore Muktaji Wagh
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Compliance
Compliance
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 28-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 16-12-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 29-10-2025 | Compliance | |
| 19-09-2025 | Compliance |
Interim Orders
Summary The court dismissed the petition filed by the defendants. The order upholds claims against the defendants in a property dispute case (R.E.Mu.N. 228/2024), finding no merit in their arguments regarding document validity, title defects, or suppression of facts. The court imposed costs of ₹20,000 on each defendant and ₹50,000 on certain co-defendants as penalty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court dismissed the petition filed by the defendants. The order upholds claims against the defendants in a property dispute case (R.E.Mu.N. 228/2024), finding no merit in their arguments regarding document validity, title defects, or suppression of facts. The court imposed costs of ₹20,000 on each defendant and ₹50,000 on certain co-defendants as penalty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts