Akshay Shankar Khandagale vs Sachin Bhausaheb Gadhe Advocate - Dhere K. S. — 228/2024

Case under Specific Relief (Amendment) Act Section 36,37,38,39. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.

Argument on Exh.____Unready Next hearing 17-Apr-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHAH140003582024

e-Filing Number

03-03-2024

Filing Number

317/2024

Filing Date

04-Mar-2024

Registration No

228/2024

Registration Date

07-Mar-2024

Court

Civil Court Senior Division, Newasa

Judge

2-Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

Last updated 14-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief (Amendment) Act Section 36,37,38,39

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Akshay Shankar Khandagale

    Adv. Shaikh Shadab R.

  2. 2.Meena Shankar Khandagale

    Adv. Shaikh Shadab R.

  3. 3.Ramdas Shankar Khandagale

    Adv. shaikh shadab

  4. 4.Vaishali Navnath Mate

    Adv. Shaikh Shadab R.

  5. 5.Alka Shankar Khandagale

    Adv. Shaikh Shadab R.

  6. 6.Dnyaneshwar Rakhmaji Khandagale

    Adv. Shaikh Shadab R.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sachin Bhausaheb Gadhe Advocate - Dhere K. S.

  2. 2.Kishore Muktaji Wagh

Case History

  1. 17-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  3. 28-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  4. 16-Dec-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary The court dismissed the petition filed by the defendants. The order upholds claims against the defendants in a property dispute case (R.E.Mu.N. 228/2024), finding no merit in their arguments regarding document validity, title defects, or suppression of facts. The court imposed costs of ₹20,000 on each defendant and ₹50,000 on certain co-defendants as penalty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 16-Dec-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  6. 29-Oct-2025

    Compliance

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  7. 19-Sep-2025

    Compliance

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  8. 07-Aug-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  9. 19-Jun-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  10. 19-Jun-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  11. 08-Apr-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  12. 27-Mar-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  13. 03-Feb-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  14. 18-Dec-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  15. 11-Nov-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  16. 18-Sep-2024

    Written Statement

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  17. 23-Aug-2024

    Written Statement

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  18. 03-Jul-2024

    Written Statement

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  19. 03-May-2024

    Awaiting Notice

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  20. 19-Mar-2024

    Awaiting Notice

    Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC

  21. 11-Mar-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  22. 04-Mar-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 228/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court dismissed the petition filed by the defendants. The order upholds claims against the defendants in a property dispute case (R.E.Mu.N. 228/2024), finding no merit in their arguments regarding document validity, title defects, or suppression of facts. The court imposed costs of ₹20,000 on each defendant and ₹50,000 on certain co-defendants as penalty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case