Chhaya Jalindar Raundal vs Eknath Vitthal Raundal Advocate - Bhusari B. R. — 188/2024
Case under Specific Relief (Amendment) Act Section 34,36,38. Status: Argument on Exh.____Ready. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAH140003162024
e-Filing Number
28-02-2024
Filing Number
274/2024
Filing Date
28-Feb-2024
Registration No
188/2024
Registration Date
29-Feb-2024
Court
Civil Court Senior Division, Newasa
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC
Last updated 14-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Chhaya Jalindar Raundal
Adv. Kardak A. G.
-
2.Jalindar Vitthal Raundal
Adv. KARDAK ASHOK GANGADHAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.Eknath Vitthal Raundal Advocate - Bhusari B. R.
-
2.Sachin Popatrao Raundal
Case History
-
23-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
02-Apr-2026
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC
-
09-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC
-
02-Feb-2026
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC
-
16-Jan-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary In case R.M.N. 188/2024 (Exh. No. 53), the court rejected the defendant's contention that Bail No. 50 was invalid and found it properly issued and enforceable against both defendants. The court ordered the defendants to deposit Rs. 25,000/- as a cost towards the affidavit and dismissed all objections raised regarding the bail's validity and execution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Jan-2026
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC
-
22-Dec-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC
-
20-Nov-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC
-
15-Oct-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC
-
03-Sep-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC
-
31-Jul-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC
-
21-Jul-2025
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC
-
09-Jul-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC
-
11-Jun-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC
-
25-Apr-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC
-
27-Mar-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC
-
28-Jan-2025
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC
-
12-Nov-2024
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC
-
14-Aug-2024
Issues
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC
-
02-Aug-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC
-
01-Aug-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC
-
25-Jul-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC
-
12-Jul-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC
-
14-Jun-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC
-
03-Jun-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC
-
18-May-2024
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC
-
15-May-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC
-
04-May-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC
-
23-Apr-2024
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC
-
20-Apr-2024
Written Statement
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC
-
10-Apr-2024
Written Statement
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC
-
26-Mar-2024
Written Statement
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC
-
11-Mar-2024
Awaiting Notice
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC
-
04-Mar-2024
Awaiting Notice
Jt. Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC
-
01-Mar-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Feb-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 188/2024
Summary In case R.M.N. 188/2024 (Exh. No. 53), the court rejected the defendant's contention that Bail No. 50 was invalid and found it properly issued and enforceable against both defendants. The court ordered the defendants to deposit Rs. 25,000/- as a cost towards the affidavit and dismissed all objections raised regarding the bail's validity and execution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts