Ajinath Dattatray Kale vs Dattatray Yashwant Kale — 87/2025

Case under Hindu Succession Act Section 6. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 27-Apr-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHAH140001382025

e-Filing Number

24-01-2025

Filing Number

144/2025

Filing Date

24-Jan-2025

Registration No

87/2025

Registration Date

29-Jan-2025

Court

Civil Court Senior Division, Newasa

Judge

3-2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Newasa

Last updated 14-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Hindu Succession Act Section 6
Specific Relief Act Section 37

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ajinath Dattatray Kale

    Adv. Bhusari B. R.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Dattatray Yashwant Kale

  2. 2.Parigabai Dattatray Kale

  3. 3.Nitin Dattatray Kale

Case History

  1. 27-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 13-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Newasa

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Newasa

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Newasa

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Newasa

  6. 27-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Newasa

  7. 05-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Newasa

  8. 26-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Newasa

  9. 19-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Newasa

  10. 07-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Newasa

  11. 15-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Newasa

  12. 13-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Newasa

  13. 30-Jun-2025

    Issues

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Newasa

  14. 02-May-2025

    Issues

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Newasa

  15. 27-Mar-2025

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    Summary The petition filed under Order 39 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 is dismissed. The court has issued an interim order restraining Defendant No. 1 from transferring the disputed agricultural property in any manner until the final judgment in the case is rendered. The court found that both the plaintiff and defendants have rights in the joint family property and that any transfer by Defendant No. 1 would prejudice the plaintiff's interests, thus making the interim relief appropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  16. 27-Mar-2025

    Issues

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Newasa

  17. 17-Mar-2025

    Order on Exh

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Newasa

  18. 15-Mar-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Newasa

  19. 11-Mar-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  20. 11-Mar-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  21. 11-Mar-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Newasa

  22. 31-Jan-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  23. 31-Jan-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  24. 31-Jan-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  25. 31-Jan-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  26. 24-Jan-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 87/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The petition filed under Order 39 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 is dismissed. The court has issued an interim order restraining Defendant No. 1 from transferring the disputed agricultural property in any manner until the final judgment in the case is rendered. The court found that both the plaintiff and defendants have rights in the joint family property and that any transfer by Defendant No. 1 would prejudice the plaintiff's interests, thus making the interim relief appropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case