Chhaya Shankar Vede vs Santosh Radhakisan Mutake Advocate - Gonge S. H. — 7/2017
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 18. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 05th May 2026.
Final Decree
CNR: MHAH080012122017
Next Hearing
05th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1076/2017
Filing Date
20-06-2017
Registration No
7/2017
Registration Date
20-06-2017
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Sangamner
Judge
1-5th Jt.Civil Judge, Senior Division
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Chhaya Shankar Vede
Adv. Jondhale S. M.
Respondent(s)
Santosh Radhakisan Mutake Advocate - Gonge S. H.
Mangal Radhakisan Mutake
Adv. Gonge S. H.
Jyoti Ganpat Nazare
Adv. Valunj J. G.
Sunita Vijay Diwane
Adv. Valunj J. G.
Anita Ghansham Rave
Adv. Valunj J. G.
Vaishali Manish Salavi
Adv. Valunj J. G.
Prakash Raghunath Mutake
Adv. NIL
Shobha Raju Inamdar
Adv. Valunj J. G.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-5th Jt.Civil Judge, Senior Division
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 04-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 13-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 21-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: The court upheld the Commissioner's report and dismissed the petitioner's objections to the boundary demarcation of a property dispute case. The court found that both the east-west and north-south boundaries of the disputed property are significant and the Commissioner's delineation was proper based on the evidence presented, including the actual layout of the premises and adjoining properties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The court upheld the Commissioner's report and dismissed the petitioner's objections to the boundary demarcation of a property dispute case. The court found that both the east-west and north-south boundaries of the disputed property are significant and the Commissioner's delineation was proper based on the evidence presented, including the actual layout of the premises and adjoining properties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts