Shankar Dada Uganmugale vs Dada Mahadu Ugalmuale — 53/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order20Rule18(1). Disposed: Uncontested--COMPROMISE BEFORE EVIDENCE on 12th March 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHAH080001152026
e-Filing Number
08-01-2026
Filing Number
116/2026
Filing Date
16-Jan-2026
Registration No
53/2026
Registration Date
16-Jan-2026
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Sangamner
Judge
7-3rd Jt Civil Judge Senior Division and Addl. CJM
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--COMPROMISE BEFORE EVIDENCE
Last updated 14-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shankar Dada Uganmugale
Adv. Kotkar T. N.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Dada Mahadu Ugalmuale
-
2.Janabai Dada Ugalmugale
-
3.Vilas Dada Ugalmugale
-
4.Suman Sopan Sangale
-
5.Vimal Niurutti Sangale
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court decreed RCS No. 53/2026 based on a compromise agreement between the plaintiff and defendants for partition of agricultural land in Ahmednagar district. The court found the compromise agreement lawful and properly executed with consent of all parties in accordance with CPC Order XXIII Rule 3, and disposed the suit by approving the agreed terms of partition among the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
3rd Jt Civil Judge Senior Division and Addl. CJM
-
09-Mar-2026
Order
3rd Jt Civil Judge Senior Division and Addl. CJM
-
04-Mar-2026
Order
3rd Jt Civil Judge Senior Division and Addl. CJM
-
23-Feb-2026
Order
3rd Jt Civil Judge Senior Division and Addl. CJM
-
17-Feb-2026
Order
3rd Jt Civil Judge Senior Division and Addl. CJM
-
10-Feb-2026
Order
3rd Jt Civil Judge Senior Division and Addl. CJM
-
29-Jan-2026
Order
3rd Jt Civil Judge Senior Division and Addl. CJM
-
19-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 53/2026
The court decreed RCS No. 53/2026 based on a compromise agreement between the plaintiff and defendants for partition of agricultural land in Ahmednagar district. The court found the compromise agreement lawful and properly executed with consent of all parties in accordance with CPC Order XXIII Rule 3, and disposed the suit by approving the agreed terms of partition among the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts