State of Maharashtra vs Akshay Balasaheb vavre — 17/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 310(2),61(2),49. Status: Filing of Surety. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHAH070004632025
Next Hearing
17th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
300/2025
Filing Date
30-05-2025
Registration No
17/2025
Registration Date
30-05-2025
Court
District and Session Court , Sangamner
Judge
8-District Judge 2 and Additional Sessions Judge,Sangamner
FIR Details
FIR Number
402
Police Station
Ghargaon Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Akshay Balasaheb vavre
Swapnil Kishor Yele
Sunil Alias neel Vijay Chavan
Manoj Alias Dayavan Balu Alias Balasaheb Sathe
Ajay Alias Bhorya Alias Bholya Balu Devkar
Yogesh Ankush Kadale
Akash Thakaram Dandvate
Dhondibhau Alias Dhondya Mahadu Jadhav
Suraj Alias Surajsing Alias Manna Harjit Singh
Hearing History
Judge: 8-District Judge 2 and Additional Sessions Judge,Sangamner
Filing of Surety
Filing of Surety
Filing of Surety
Filing of Surety
Filing of Surety
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 04-04-2026 | Filing of Surety | |
| 20-03-2026 | Filing of Surety | |
| 18-03-2026 | Filing of Surety | |
| 17-03-2026 | Filing of Surety | |
| 09-03-2026 | Filing of Surety |
Interim Orders
Summary: Regular bail has been granted to Accused No.5 Ajay Balu Devkar in Sessions Case No.17/2025 (State vs. Akshay and others), a jewellery shop robbery case involving ₹52,41,600 in stolen ornaments. The court found his role limited compared to co-accused already enlarged on bail and applied the parity principle, though imposing stringent conditions including furnishing of ₹80,000 surety, attending court proceedings, non-contact with witnesses, travel restrictions, and a geographical limit barring entry to village Sakur until trial conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: Regular bail has been granted to Accused No.5 Ajay Balu Devkar in Sessions Case No.17/2025 (State vs. Akshay and others), a jewellery shop robbery case involving ₹52,41,600 in stolen ornaments. The court found his role limited compared to co-accused already enlarged on bail and applied the parity principle, though imposing stringent conditions including furnishing of ₹80,000 surety, attending court proceedings, non-contact with witnesses, travel restrictions, and a geographical limit barring entry to village Sakur until trial conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts