The State of Maharashtra vs Maruti Chhbu Chaugule Advocate - Palve A. H. — 9400/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E)(F). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 22nd April 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHAH030116592024
Next Hearing
22nd April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
11655/2024
Filing Date
09-10-2024
Registration No
9400/2024
Registration Date
10-10-2024
Court
Chief Judicial Magistarte ,Ahmednagar
Judge
24-17th Jt. CJSD and Addl. CJM
FIR Details
FIR Number
196
Police Station
The State Excise Department
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Maruti Chhbu Chaugule Advocate - Palve A. H.
Hearing History
Judge: 24-17th Jt. CJSD and Addl. CJM
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Report
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 29-01-2026 | Evidence | |
| 22-12-2025 | Evidence | |
| 20-11-2025 | Evidence | |
| 29-09-2025 | Report |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is a witness examination record in case FIR 9400/2024 involving illegal liquor manufacturing. The prosecution witness, an excise officer, testified about a raid conducted on May 26, 2024, at the accused Maruti Chhotu Choughule's residence in Khulgaon, Ahmednagar district, where illegal country liquor production equipment and approximately 520 liters of liquor and raw materials (valued at Rs. 29,250) were seized. During cross-examination, the accused's counsel challenged the legality of the raid, questioning the absence of proper notice and panchas (witnesses), which the witness denied. The court recorded the complete testimony on March 9, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is a witness examination record in case FIR 9400/2024 involving illegal liquor manufacturing. The prosecution witness, an excise officer, testified about a raid conducted on May 26, 2024, at the accused Maruti Chhotu Choughule's residence in Khulgaon, Ahmednagar district, where illegal country liquor production equipment and approximately 520 liters of liquor and raw materials (valued at Rs. 29,250) were seized. During cross-examination, the accused's counsel challenged the legality of the raid, questioning the absence of proper notice and panchas (witnesses), which the witness denied. The court recorded the complete testimony on March 9, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts