State of Kerala vs PRASANTH @ MANICHAN — 100076/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 121(1). Status: To summon witness. Next hearing: 26th June 2026.

CC - CALENDAR CASE

CNR: KLTV500003062025

To summon witness

Next Hearing

26th June 2026

Filing Number

291/2025

Filing Date

04-02-2025

Registration No

100076/2025

Registration Date

04-02-2025

Court

Judicial First class Magistrate Court 1 Kattakkada

Judge

1-JFCM Kattakada

FIR Details

FIR Number

397

Police Station

Maranallor

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 121(1)
Crl.MP/1/2026 Classification : Bail Application Section PRASANTH @ MANICHANState of Kerala
Crl.MP/2/2026 Classification : Advance Application Section PRASANTH @ MANICHANState of Kerala
Crl.MP/3/2026 Classification : Petition Section PRASANTH @ MANICHANState of Kerala

Petitioner(s)

State of Kerala

Respondent(s)

PRASANTH @ MANICHAN

Hearing History

Judge: 1-JFCM Kattakada

25-05-2026

To summon witness

12-05-2026

Remand Extended

11-05-2026

Call on

08-05-2026

Remand Extended

24-04-2026

To summon witness

Interim Orders

12-05-2026
Order

Case 100076/2025 Summary: Prasanth @ Manichan's bail application was granted by the Kattakada Judicial First Class Magistrate on May 11, 2026. Accused of lurking house-trespass by night at a temple (Section 121(1) BNS), he had been in judicial custody since September 6, 2024. The court allowed bail on self-bond of Rs. 50,000, noting investigation completion, charge framing, absence of criminal antecedents, and that prolonged detention served no purpose. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 100076/2025 Summary: Prasanth @ Manichan's bail application was granted by the Kattakada Judicial First Class Magistrate on May 11, 2026. Accused of lurking house-trespass by night at a temple (Section 121(1) BNS), he had been in judicial custody since September 6, 2024. The court allowed bail on self-bond of Rs. 50,000, noting investigation completion, charge framing, absence of criminal antecedents, and that prolonged detention served no purpose. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Judicial First class Magistrate Court 1 Kattakkada All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case