Beena vs Vipinkumar — 500070/2024

Case under Domestic Violence Act Section SECTION 12. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 19th May 2026.

MC - MISCELLANEOUS CASE

CNR: KLTV360010282024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

21-06-2024

Filing Number

501020/2024

Filing Date

25-06-2024

Registration No

500070/2024

Registration Date

02-07-2024

Court

Judicial First class Magistrate Court 2 Nedumangadu

Judge

1-JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-II NEDUMANGAD

Decision Date

19th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

Domestic Violence Act Section SECTION 12
Crl.MP/1/2026 Classification : Petition To Set Aside Order / Decree Section BeenaVipinkumar

Petitioner(s)

Beena

Adv. FARSANA.S.A

Aadhya

Adv. FARSANA.S.A

Aaradhya

Adv. FARSANA.S.A

Aarav

Adv. FARSANA.S.A

Respondent(s)

Vipinkumar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-II NEDUMANGAD

19-05-2026

Disposed

15-05-2026

Appearance Of Parties

08-05-2026

Order/ Judgement

06-05-2026

Orders in IA

13-03-2026

For Objection and hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

19-05-2026
Interim Order

Case Summary: 500070/2024 The court allowed Vipinkumar's petition to set aside an ex parte order passed against him in a domestic violence case filed under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court found his absence on the objection filing date (08.12.2025) was non-willful due to Sabarimala duty squad engagement, and accepted his explanation for the delay. However, the court imposed costs of Rs. 500/- as a condition for allowing the petition, considering the delay incurred. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 500070/2024 The court allowed Vipinkumar's petition to set aside an ex parte order passed against him in a domestic violence case filed under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court found his absence on the objection filing date (08.12.2025) was non-willful due to Sabarimala duty squad engagement, and accepted his explanation for the delay. However, the court imposed costs of Rs. 500/- as a condition for allowing the petition, considering the delay incurred. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Judicial First class Magistrate Court 2 Nedumangadu All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case