State of Kerala (Police) vs AJITH KUMAR — 670/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 331(4), 305, 238. Status: for evidence.. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.
Cr.No(TVM-PS-Vattappara) - Vattappara Police Station
CNR: KLTV350030852025
Next Hearing
06th July 2026
e-Filing Number
12-09-2025
Filing Number
950/2025
Filing Date
23-10-2025
Registration No
670/2025
Registration Date
23-10-2025
Court
Judicial First class Magistrate Court 1 Nedumangadu
Judge
1-JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-I NEDUMANGAD
FIR Details
FIR Number
950
Police Station
Vattappara Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala (Police)
Respondent(s)
AJITH KUMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE-I NEDUMANGAD
for evidence.
for evidence.
For Hg and F/c
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | for evidence. |
| 28-01-2026 | for evidence. |
| 05-12-2025 | For Hg and F/c |
| 21-11-2025 | FOR HEARING |
| 07-11-2025 | FOR HEARING |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: State of Kerala v. Ajith Kumar (CC 670/2025) The petition was allowed. Ajith Kumar, accused of offences under BNS sections 331(4), 305, and 238, sought modification of his existing bail conditions to allow release on self-bond instead of furnishing solvent sureties, citing financial incapacity. The court granted the petition, noting he had been in judicial custody for 93 days and investigation was complete, modifying the bail condition to require a self-bond of Rs. 50,000 instead of surety bonds, while other conditions remained unchanged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Kerala v. Ajith Kumar (CC 670/2025) The petition was allowed. Ajith Kumar, accused of offences under BNS sections 331(4), 305, and 238, sought modification of his existing bail conditions to allow release on self-bond instead of furnishing solvent sureties, citing financial incapacity. The court granted the petition, noting he had been in judicial custody for 93 days and investigation was complete, modifying the bail condition to require a self-bond of Rs. 50,000 instead of surety bonds, while other conditions remained unchanged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts