State of Kerala (Police) vs AJITH KUMAR — 670/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 331(4), 305, 238. Status: for evidence.. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.
Cr.No(TVM-PS-Vattappara) - Vattappara Police Station
CNR: KLTV350030852025
e-Filing Number
12-09-2025
Filing Number
950/2025
Filing Date
23-Oct-2025
Registration No
670/2025
Registration Date
23-Oct-2025
Court
Judicial First class Magistrate Court 1 Nedumangadu
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Nedumangad
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
950
Police Station
Vattappara Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Kerala (Police)
Respondent(s)
-
1.AJITH KUMAR
Case History
-
06-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
13-Mar-2026
for evidence.
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Nedumangad
-
28-Jan-2026
for evidence.
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Nedumangad
-
05-Dec-2025
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: State of Kerala v. Ajith Kumar (CC 670/2025) The petition was allowed. Ajith Kumar, accused of offences under BNS sections 331(4), 305, and 238, sought modification of his existing bail conditions to allow release on self-bond instead of furnishing solvent sureties, citing financial incapacity. The court granted the petition, noting he had been in judicial custody for 93 days and investigation was complete, modifying the bail condition to require a self-bond of Rs. 50,000 instead of surety bonds, while other conditions remained unchanged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Dec-2025
For Hg and F/c
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Nedumangad
-
21-Nov-2025
For Hearing
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Nedumangad
-
07-Nov-2025
For Hearing
Judicial First Class Magistrate-I Nedumangad
-
24-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 670/2025
Case Summary: State of Kerala v. Ajith Kumar (CC 670/2025) The petition was allowed. Ajith Kumar, accused of offences under BNS sections 331(4), 305, and 238, sought modification of his existing bail conditions to allow release on self-bond instead of furnishing solvent sureties, citing financial incapacity. The court granted the petition, noting he had been in judicial custody for 93 days and investigation was complete, modifying the bail condition to require a self-bond of Rs. 50,000 instead of surety bonds, while other conditions remained unchanged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts