M Jayakumar vs Lalithakumari Advocate - RADHAKRISHNAN S, RADHAKRISHNAN S — 200012/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 21. Status: Call With IA. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
EP - EXECUTION PETITION
CNR: KLTV330003042023
Next Hearing
06th June 2026
e-Filing Number
30-07-2023
Filing Number
234/2023
Filing Date
31-07-2023
Registration No
200012/2023
Registration Date
31-07-2023
Court
Sub Court Nedumangadu
Judge
1-SUB JUDGE AND ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE NEDUMANGAD
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M Jayakumar
Adv. N SATHEESH KUMAR
Respondent(s)
Lalithakumari Advocate - RADHAKRISHNAN S, RADHAKRISHNAN S
Hearing History
Judge: 1-SUB JUDGE AND ASSISTANT SESSIONS JUDGE NEDUMANGAD
Call With IA
FOR HEARING
Call with EA
For hearing on EA
Sale
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-06-2026 | Call With IA |
| 01-06-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 29-05-2026 | Call with EA |
| 26-05-2026 | For hearing on EA |
| 25-05-2026 | Sale |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: EP 12/2023 in OS 218/2012 Outcome: Execution petition allowed. The court ordered the judicial sale of the judgment debtor's charged property (6.56 acres with building in Aruvikkara village, Thiruvananthapuram) to recover the decree amount. The upset price was fixed at Rs. 19,84,330/-, with sale scheduled for 25.05.2026 and sale report on 26.05.2026. Key Finding: The court held that the judgment debtor's settlement deed executed in favor of her husband on 27.06.2022 (after the decree was passed on 31.08.2016) constituted an alienation to defeat the decree and was therefore invalid. The decree amount of Rs. 19,58,098/- (with interest) remains recoverable from the charged property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: EP 12/2023 in OS 218/2012 Outcome: Execution petition allowed. The court ordered the judicial sale of the judgment debtor's charged property (6.56 acres with building in Aruvikkara village, Thiruvananthapuram) to recover the decree amount. The upset price was fixed at Rs. 19,84,330/-, with sale scheduled for 25.05.2026 and sale report on 26.05.2026. Key Finding: The court held that the judgment debtor's settlement deed executed in favor of her husband on 27.06.2022 (after the decree was passed on 31.08.2016) constituted an alienation to defeat the decree and was therefore invalid. The decree amount of Rs. 19,58,098/- (with interest) remains recoverable from the charged property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts