M Jayakumar vs Lalithakumari Advocate - RADHAKRISHNAN S, RADHAKRISHNAN S — 200012/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 21. Status: Call With IA. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.

Call With IA Next hearing 06-Jun-2026 this date has passed

EP - EXECUTION PETITION

CNR: KLTV330003042023

e-Filing Number

30-07-2023

Filing Number

234/2023

Filing Date

31-Jul-2023

Registration No

200012/2023

Registration Date

31-Jul-2023

Court

Sub Court Nedumangadu

Judge

1-Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 21

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M Jayakumar

    Adv. N SATHEESH KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Lalithakumari Advocate - RADHAKRISHNAN S, RADHAKRISHNAN S

Case History

  1. 06-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-Jun-2026

    Call With IA

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  3. 01-Jun-2026

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  4. 29-May-2026

    Call with Ea

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  5. 26-May-2026

    For hearing on Ea

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  6. 25-May-2026

    Sale

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  7. 13-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: EP 12/2023 in OS 218/2012 Outcome: Execution petition allowed. The court ordered the judicial sale of the judgment debtor's charged property (6.56 acres with building in Aruvikkara village, Thiruvananthapuram) to recover the decree amount. The upset price was fixed at Rs. 19,84,330/-, with sale scheduled for 25.05.2026 and sale report on 26.05.2026. Key Finding: The court held that the judgment debtor's settlement deed executed in favor of her husband on 27.06.2022 (after the decree was passed on 31.08.2016) constituted an alienation to defeat the decree and was therefore invalid. The decree amount of Rs. 19,58,098/- (with interest) remains recoverable from the charged property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  8. 13-Mar-2026

    Sale

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  9. 04-Mar-2026

    For Orders

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  10. 19-Feb-2026

    call on

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  11. 30-Jan-2026

    call on

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  12. 03-Jan-2026

    call on

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  13. 20-Nov-2025

    call on

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  14. 22-Oct-2025

    OrderView PDF

  15. 22-Oct-2025

    call on

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  16. 17-Sep-2025

    call on

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  17. 13-Aug-2025

    Objection

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  18. 25-Jul-2025

    call on

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  19. 01-Jul-2025

    call on

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  20. 13-Jun-2025

    call on

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  21. 24-Mar-2025

    Issue Rule 66 notice to Jd

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  22. 07-Mar-2025

    Issue Rule 66 notice to Jd

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  23. 06-Jan-2025

    For Steps

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  24. 16-Nov-2024

    For Steps

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  25. 30-Sep-2024

    Objection

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  26. 01-Aug-2024

    Objection

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  27. 30-May-2024

    call on

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  28. 01-Apr-2024

    call on

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  29. 01-Feb-2024

    call on

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  30. 01-Dec-2023

    call on

    Sub Judge And Assistant Sessions Judge Nedumangad

  31. 30-Sep-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 31-Jul-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 200012/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: EP 12/2023 in OS 218/2012 Outcome: Execution petition allowed. The court ordered the judicial sale of the judgment debtor's charged property (6.56 acres with building in Aruvikkara village, Thiruvananthapuram) to recover the decree amount. The upset price was fixed at Rs. 19,84,330/-, with sale scheduled for 25.05.2026 and sale report on 26.05.2026. Key Finding: The court held that the judgment debtor's settlement deed executed in favor of her husband on 27.06.2022 (after the decree was passed on 31.08.2016) constituted an alienation to defeat the decree and was therefore invalid. The decree amount of Rs. 19,58,098/- (with interest) remains recoverable from the charged property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case