Karthiyani vs Savithri Advocate - HELNA M S — 400/2025

Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section Order 7 Rule 1. Disposed: Uncontested--FINAL DECREE PASSED on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLTR230008032025

Filing Number

1107/2025

Filing Date

24-Oct-2025

Registration No

400/2025

Registration Date

24-Oct-2025

Court

Munsiff Court, Wadakkanchery

Judge

1-Munsiff, Wadakkanchery

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--FINAL DECREE PASSED

Last updated 23-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section Order 7 Rule 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Karthiyani

    Adv. C.P.Ashokkumar

  2. 2.Komalam

    Adv. C.P.Ashokkumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Savithri Advocate - HELNA M S

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    The Court of Munsiff, Wadakanchery approved a mediation settlement in this partition suit between Karthyayani, Komalam, and Savithri. The court found the mediation agreement legally valid and issued a composite decree allocating separate plots (A, B, C) to each party and designating Plot D as a common pathway, based on a survey plan prepared by the parties with a private surveyor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Munsiff, Wadakkanchery

  4. 31-Mar-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Munsiff, Wadakkanchery

  5. 19-Mar-2026

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff, Wadakkanchery

  6. 11-Feb-2026

    Report on mediation

    Munsiff, Wadakkanchery

  7. 22-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 24-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 400/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Court of Munsiff, Wadakanchery approved a mediation settlement in this partition suit between Karthyayani, Komalam, and Savithri. The court found the mediation agreement legally valid and issued a composite decree allocating separate plots (A, B, C) to each party and designating Plot D as a common pathway, based on a survey plan prepared by the parties with a private surveyor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case