Paul vs Jeemon Advocate - Poly Ambooken, PRASADAN.T.V — 200039/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1,O39R12,Dec151,O26R9. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED on 07th April 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLTR130001402024
e-Filing Number
17-02-2024
Filing Number
200182/2024
Filing Date
20-02-2024
Registration No
200039/2024
Registration Date
20-02-2024
Court
Sub Court, Irinjalakuda
Judge
1-Principal Sub Judge
Decision Date
07th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECREED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Paul
Adv. MADHUSUDHANAN P
Respondent(s)
Jeemon Advocate - Poly Ambooken, PRASADAN.T.V
Aniee
Adv. Poly Ambooken,PRASADAN.T.V
Valsa
Adv. PAULY J ARICATT
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal Sub Judge
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
Order/Judgement
Order/ Judgement
Order/ Judgement
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 26-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement | |
| 21-03-2026 | Order/Judgement | |
| 11-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement | |
| 28-02-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The court decreed the suit for specific performance of a property sale contract based on a mediation settlement between the parties. The defendants agreed to sell 685 cents of property at Rs. 20,000 per cent within 3 months, with the plaintiff paying an additional Rs. 3,00,000, with prior advance adjustments. The court found the mediation agreement legally valid and not contrary to public policy, thereby accepting it as binding and ordering refund of court fees to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court decreed the suit for specific performance of a property sale contract based on a mediation settlement between the parties. The defendants agreed to sell 685 cents of property at Rs. 20,000 per cent within 3 months, with the plaintiff paying an additional Rs. 3,00,000, with prior advance adjustments. The court found the mediation agreement legally valid and not contrary to public policy, thereby accepting it as binding and ordering refund of court fees to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts