Paul vs Jeemon Advocate - Poly Ambooken, PRASADAN.T.V — 200039/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1,O39R12,Dec151,O26R9. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED on 07th April 2026.

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLTR130001402024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

17-02-2024

Filing Number

200182/2024

Filing Date

20-02-2024

Registration No

200039/2024

Registration Date

20-02-2024

Court

Sub Court, Irinjalakuda

Judge

1-Principal Sub Judge

Decision Date

07th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DECREED

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section O7R1,O39R12,Dec151,O26R9
IA/10/2025 Classification : Application To Accept Power Of Attorney Section JeemonPaul
IA/1/2026 Classification : Advance Application Section PaulJeemon

Petitioner(s)

Paul

Adv. MADHUSUDHANAN P

Respondent(s)

Jeemon Advocate - Poly Ambooken, PRASADAN.T.V

Aniee

Adv. Poly Ambooken,PRASADAN.T.V

Valsa

Adv. PAULY J ARICATT

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal Sub Judge

07-04-2026

Disposed

26-03-2026

Order/ Judgement

21-03-2026

Order/Judgement

11-03-2026

Order/ Judgement

28-02-2026

Order/ Judgement

Final Orders / Judgements

07-04-2026
Judgement

Summary: The court decreed the suit for specific performance of a property sale contract based on a mediation settlement between the parties. The defendants agreed to sell 685 cents of property at Rs. 20,000 per cent within 3 months, with the plaintiff paying an additional Rs. 3,00,000, with prior advance adjustments. The court found the mediation agreement legally valid and not contrary to public policy, thereby accepting it as binding and ordering refund of court fees to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court decreed the suit for specific performance of a property sale contract based on a mediation settlement between the parties. The defendants agreed to sell 685 cents of property at Rs. 20,000 per cent within 3 months, with the plaintiff paying an additional Rs. 3,00,000, with prior advance adjustments. The court found the mediation agreement legally valid and not contrary to public policy, thereby accepting it as binding and ordering refund of court fees to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Irinjalakuda All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case