Sebastian vs Gopinathan Advocate - IBEN MATHEN M — 19/2026

Case under Building (lease and Rent Control )act, 1959 Section section 18. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 17th March 2026.

RCA - CIVIL APPEAL (RENT CONTROL)

CNR: KLTR110002222026

Case disposed

Filing Number

5/2026

Filing Date

13-02-2026

Registration No

19/2026

Registration Date

16-02-2026

Court

Additional District And Sessions Court Motor Accident Claims Tribunal / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Irinjalakuda

Judge

1-Additional Dist and Session Judge/MACT

Decision Date

17th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

BUILDING (LEASE AND RENT CONTROL )ACT, 1959 Section section 18
IA/1/2026 Classification : Delay Condonation Application Section Sebastian
IA/2/2026 Classification : Advance Application Section SebastianGopinathan

Petitioner(s)

Sebastian

Adv. RAJESH THAMPAN

Respondent(s)

Gopinathan Advocate - IBEN MATHEN M

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Additional Dist and Session Judge/MACT

17-03-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

Orders in IA

13-03-2026

Orders in IA

12-03-2026

Orders in IA

10-03-2026

Orders in IA

Final Orders / Judgements

17-03-2026
Judgement
17-03-2026
Order

Case Summary: Sebastian v. Gopinathan Advocate (RCA 19/2026) The Rent Control Appellate Authority dismissed Sebastian's (tenant's) petition to condone a 901-day delay in filing an appeal, finding the appeal itself unmaintainable. Although the trial court found the landlord's bonafide need for possession, it ultimately dismissed the eviction petition after finding the tenant had vacant rooms available and depended on rental income. The court held that the tenant cannot independently appeal against only the bonafide need finding when the overall judgment favors the tenant; any challenge must be made through the landlord's pending appeal. Consequently, the delay condonation petition was dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Sebastian v. Gopinathan Advocate (RCA 19/2026) The Rent Control Appellate Authority dismissed Sebastian's (tenant's) petition to condone a 901-day delay in filing an appeal, finding the appeal itself unmaintainable. Although the trial court found the landlord's bonafide need for possession, it ultimately dismissed the eviction petition after finding the tenant had vacant rooms available and depended on rental income. The court held that the tenant cannot independently appeal against only the bonafide need finding when the overall judgment favors the tenant; any challenge must be made through the landlord's pending appeal. Consequently, the delay condonation petition was dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Additional District And Sessions Court Motor Accident Claims Tribunal / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Irinjalakuda All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case