Arun. M.P vs Parameswaran Advocate - BINDU M V — 311/2017

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Pre trial steps. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.

Pre trial steps Next hearing 06-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLML130007982017

Filing Number

875/2017

Filing Date

31-Oct-2017

Registration No

311/2017

Registration Date

31-Oct-2017

Court

Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court

Judge

1-Munsiff Magistrate

Last updated 19-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Arun. M.P

    Adv. V.Chandrashekaran and K.Vipin

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Parameswaran Advocate - BINDU M V

  2. 2.Subadra

  3. 3.Kalyani

  4. 4.Sarada

  5. 5.Velayudhan

  6. 6.Bhaskaran

  7. 7.Shivadasan

  8. 8.Jaya

  9. 9.Manoj

  10. 10.Mahesh

  11. 11.Manjula

  12. 12.Indira

  13. 13.Arjunan

  14. 14.Satheesan

    Adv. BINDU M V

Case History

  1. 06-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Pre trial steps

    Munsiff Magistrate

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Pre trial steps

    Munsiff Magistrate

  4. 02-Feb-2026

    Issues

    Munsiff Magistrate

  5. 08-Jan-2026

    Issues

    Munsiff Magistrate

  6. 11-Dec-2025

    No sitting notified

    Munsiff Magistrate

  7. 20-Nov-2025

    Written Statement

    Munsiff Magistrate

  8. 16-Oct-2025

    Issue Summons

    Munsiff Magistrate

  9. 30-Sep-2025

    No sitting notified

    Munsiff Magistrate

  10. 25-Aug-2025

    OrderView PDF

  11. 25-Aug-2025

    OrderView PDF

    Summary In a property partition suit (OS 311/2017), the Munsiff Court of Tirur allowed the plaintiff's application to implead a necessary party (Satheesan as defendant No. 14) but partly rejected his application to amend the plaint by adding allegations that disputed partition deeds were forged and the executor was mentally unsound since 2014. The court found the proposed amendment barred by limitation law and filed too late (6 years after the defendants' written statement), noting it sought to challenge registered documents executed 8-9 years prior. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  12. 25-Aug-2025

    Issue Summons

    Munsiff Magistrate

  13. 06-Aug-2025

    Call on

    Munsiff Magistrate

  14. 05-Aug-2025

    Call with IA

    Munsiff Magistrate

  15. 29-Jul-2025

    Call with IA

    Munsiff Magistrate

  16. 24-Jun-2025

    Call with IA

    Munsiff Magistrate

  17. 23-May-2025

    Call with IA

    Munsiff Magistrate

  18. 22-Feb-2025

    Call with IA

    Munsiff Magistrate

  19. 23-Jan-2025

    Call with IA

    Munsiff Magistrate

  20. 15-Jan-2025

    Call with IA

    Munsiff Magistrate

  21. 19-Nov-2024

    Call with IA

    Munsiff Magistrate

  22. 12-Nov-2024

    Call with IA

    Munsiff Magistrate

  23. 08-Nov-2024

    Call with IA

    Munsiff Magistrate

  24. 04-Nov-2024

    Call with IA

    Munsiff Magistrate

  25. 23-Oct-2024

    Call with IA

    Munsiff Magistrate

  26. 22-Oct-2024

    Call with IA

    Munsiff Magistrate

  27. 27-Sep-2024

    Call with IA

    Munsiff Magistrate

  28. 12-Sep-2024

    Call with IA

    Munsiff Magistrate

  29. 05-Sep-2024

    Call with IA

    Munsiff Magistrate

  30. 04-Sep-2024

    Call on

    Munsiff Magistrate

  31. 23-Jul-2024

    Listed to

    Munsiff Magistrate

  32. 07-Jun-2024

    For Steps

    Munsiff Magistrate

  33. 06-Feb-2024

    Pre trial steps

    Munsiff Magistrate

  34. 18-Dec-2023

    Pre trial steps

    Munsiff Magistrate

  35. 04-Nov-2023

    For Steps

    Munsiff Magistrate

  36. 04-Aug-2023

    Restored

    Munsiff Magistrate

  37. 04-Aug-2023

    Call on

    Munsiff Magistrate

  38. 04-Aug-2023

    For Steps

    Munsiff Magistrate

  39. 17-Nov-2021

    JudgementView PDF

  40. 17-Nov-2021

    Disposed

    Munsiff Magistrate

  41. 18-Sep-2021

    Listed to

    Munsiff Magistrate

  42. 06-Aug-2021

    For Steps

    Munsiff Magistrate

  43. 16-Jul-2021

    For Steps

    Munsiff Magistrate

  44. 04-Jun-2021

    For Steps

    Munsiff Magistrate

  45. 23-Mar-2021

    For Steps

    Munsiff Magistrate

  46. 01-Feb-2021

    For Steps

    Munsiff Magistrate

  47. 07-Nov-2020

    For Steps

    Munsiff Magistrate

  48. 01-Oct-2020

    For Steps

    Munsiff Magistrate

  49. 08-Jul-2020

    For Steps

    Munsiff Magistrate

  50. 27-Mar-2020

    For Steps

    Munsiff Magistrate

  51. 09-Jan-2020

    For Steps

    Munsiff Magistrate

  52. 03-Oct-2019

    For Steps

    Munsiff Magistrate

  53. 20-Jul-2019

    For Steps

    Munsiff Magistrate

  54. 03-Jun-2019

    For Steps

    Munsiff Magistrate

  55. 13-Mar-2019

    Issues

    Munsiff Magistrate

  56. 11-Jan-2019

    Issues

    Munsiff Magistrate

  57. 19-Nov-2018

    Issues

    Munsiff Magistrate

  58. 01-Oct-2018

    Issues

    Munsiff Magistrate

  59. 09-Aug-2018

    Issues

    Munsiff Magistrate

  60. 23-Jun-2018

    Issues

    Munsiff Magistrate

  61. 26-May-2018

    Written Statement

    Munsiff Magistrate

  62. 26-Feb-2018

    Written Statement

    Munsiff Magistrate

  63. 09-Jan-2018

    Written Statement

    Munsiff Magistrate

  64. 22-Nov-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  65. 31-Oct-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. 311/2017

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In a property partition suit (OS 311/2017), the Munsiff Court of Tirur allowed the plaintiff's application to implead a necessary party (Satheesan as defendant No. 14) but partly rejected his application to amend the plaint by adding allegations that disputed partition deeds were forged and the executor was mentally unsound since 2014. The court found the proposed amendment barred by limitation law and filed too late (6 years after the defendants' written statement), noting it sought to challenge registered documents executed 8-9 years prior. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case