State of Kerala - Pala Police vs Nidhun Kumar K — 100400/2025

Case under Information Technology Act Section 67B. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED U/S 258 BNSS on 31st March 2026.

Case disposed

SC - SESSIONS CASE

CNR: KLKT350000482025

Filing Number

100028/2025

Filing Date

13-Jun-2025

Registration No

100400/2025

Registration Date

13-Jun-2025

Court

Fast Track Special Court, Erattupetta

Judge

1-Special Judge, Ftsc Erattupetta

Decision Date

31-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED U/S 258 BNSS

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

1921

Police Station

Pala Police Station

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Information Technology Act Section 67B
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act Section 12,11

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Kerala - Pala Police

    Adv. Government Advocate, Erattupetta

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Nidhun Kumar K

  2. 2.Jithin Mohan M

    Adv. C S Ajayan,C S Ajayan

  3. 3.Syam Mohan

    Adv. Roshen Roy,Jose Joseph Abhijith Nair Roshen Roy

  4. 4.Abhiram V S

  5. 5.Sohil P Alex

    Adv. Roshen Roy,Jose Joseph Abhijith Nair Roshen Roy

  6. 6.Unknown

  7. 7.Abhijith K P

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 31-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary Nidhun Kumar K and Others v. State of Kerala Sessions Case No. 400/2025, Erattupetta Fast Track Special Court Judgment dated 31 March 2026 The court acquitted all six accused (Nidhun Kumar K, Jithin Mohan M, Syam Mohan, Abhiram V.S., Sohil P. Alex, and Abhijith K.P.) of charges under POCSO Act sections 12 r/w 11(iii) and 11(v), and IT Act section 67B(d) for allegedly showing private parts to a child and extorting nude images via Instagram, WhatsApp, and Snapchat. The survivor categorically denied knowing the accused or any contact with them, while the only supporting witness (the child's father) gave testimony marked by significant contradictions with his police statement and was found to harbor animosity toward the victim's household; additionally, critical forensic evidence of the mobile phone was absent, rendering the prosecution's case insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 31-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Special Judge, Ftsc Erattupetta

  4. 27-Mar-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Special Judge, Ftsc Erattupetta

  5. 26-Mar-2026

    For Hearing

    Special Judge, Ftsc Erattupetta

  6. 25-Mar-2026

    Defence Evidence

    Special Judge, Ftsc Erattupetta

  7. 24-Mar-2026

    For hearing under section 255 Bnss

    Special Judge, Ftsc Erattupetta

  8. 21-Mar-2026

    Examination of the Accused U/S 351 Bnss

    Special Judge, Ftsc Erattupetta

  9. 18-Mar-2026

    For Examination of Witness

    Special Judge, Ftsc Erattupetta

  10. 16-Mar-2026

    For Examination of Witness

    Special Judge, Ftsc Erattupetta

  11. 13-Mar-2026

    For Examination of Witness

    Special Judge, Ftsc Erattupetta

  12. 12-Mar-2026

    For Examination of Witness

    Special Judge, Ftsc Erattupetta

  13. 11-Mar-2026

    For Examination of Witness

    Special Judge, Ftsc Erattupetta

  14. 02-Mar-2026

    For Examination of Witness

    Special Judge, Ftsc Erattupetta

  15. 21-Feb-2026

    For Examination of Witness

    Special Judge, Ftsc Erattupetta

  16. 03-Feb-2026

    For Examination of Witness

    Special Judge, Ftsc Erattupetta

  17. 29-Jan-2026

    Hearing on Charge

    Special Judge, Ftsc Erattupetta

  18. 19-Jan-2026

    Call on

    Special Judge, Ftsc Erattupetta

  19. 05-Jan-2026

    Report from Fsl

    Special Judge, Ftsc Erattupetta

  20. 20-Dec-2025

    Report from Fsl

    Special Judge, Ftsc Erattupetta

  21. 06-Dec-2025

    Report from Fsl

    Special Judge, Ftsc Erattupetta

  22. 21-Nov-2025

    Report from Fsl

    Special Judge, Ftsc Erattupetta

  23. 07-Nov-2025

    Report from Fsl

    Special Judge, Ftsc Erattupetta

  24. 23-Oct-2025

    Report from Fsl

    Special Judge, Ftsc Erattupetta

  25. 08-Oct-2025

    Report from Fsl

    Special Judge, Ftsc Erattupetta

  26. 24-Sep-2025

    Report from Fsl

    Special Judge, Ftsc Erattupetta

  27. 09-Sep-2025

    Report from Fsl

    Special Judge, Ftsc Erattupetta

  28. 21-Aug-2025

    Report from Fsl

    Special Judge, Ftsc Erattupetta

  29. 07-Aug-2025

    Report from Fsl

    Special Judge, Ftsc Erattupetta

  30. 26-Jul-2025

    Report from Fsl

    Special Judge, Ftsc Erattupetta

  31. 10-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 13-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 100400/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Nidhun Kumar K and Others v. State of Kerala Sessions Case No. 400/2025, Erattupetta Fast Track Special Court Judgment dated 31 March 2026 The court acquitted all six accused (Nidhun Kumar K, Jithin Mohan M, Syam Mohan, Abhiram V.S., Sohil P. Alex, and Abhijith K.P.) of charges under POCSO Act sections 12 r/w 11(iii) and 11(v), and IT Act section 67B(d) for allegedly showing private parts to a child and extorting nude images via Instagram, WhatsApp, and Snapchat. The survivor categorically denied knowing the accused or any contact with them, while the only supporting witness (the child's father) gave testimony marked by significant contradictions with his police statement and was found to harbor animosity toward the victim's household; additionally, critical forensic evidence of the mobile phone was absent, rendering the prosecution's case insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case