Biju P S vs BAIJU B Advocate - GEORGE KURIAN — 9/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Appearance of Parties. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLKT170000142026

Appearance of Parties

Next Hearing

12th June 2026

Filing Number

9/2026

Filing Date

12-01-2026

Registration No

9/2026

Registration Date

13-01-2026

Court

Munsiff Court Kanjirappally

Judge

1-MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26
Ia/1/2026 Classification : Injunction Application Section Biju P S
Ia/2/2026 Classification : Application to Receive Documents Section BAIJU B
Ia/3/2026 Classification : Application to Accept Power of Attorney Section Biju P S
Ia/4/2026 Classification : Commission Application Section Biju P S

Petitioner(s)

Biju P S

Adv. Ninan K.S

Respondent(s)

BAIJU B Advocate - GEORGE KURIAN

SOUMYAMOL K D

Adv. GEORGE KURIAN

SHARAJ K K

Adv. Premchand,Dilsha A A RAGESH T B YEDHU KRISHNAN V J Saneeta ROBIN Premchand

Hearing History

Judge: 1-MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY

07-04-2026

Appearance of Parties

06-04-2026

Call On

04-04-2026

Call On

01-04-2026

Call On

23-03-2026

For Hearing

Interim Orders

13-01-2026
Order
07-04-2026
Order

Case Summary: Biju P S v. Baiju B & Others (IA 1/2026 in O.S 9/2026) Outcome: The petition for temporary prohibitory injunction was dismissed. The court vacated the earlier injunction granted on 13.01.2026, finding the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case against the defendants. Key Facts: Petitioner claimed entitlement to Rs. 7,70,000 from defendants based on a 2024 property exchange agreement. However, petitioner himself witnessed subsequent agreements (2024-2025) transferring the property to the third defendant, and did not raise liability claims when the sale deed was executed. The third defendant now holds legal title, tax receipts, possession certificate, and building permit for the property. Court's Finding: The court found no documentary evidence supporting petitioner's claimed liability from defendants, and ruled that granting an injunction would cause irreparable injury to the third defendant's established title and ongoing construction activities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Biju P S v. Baiju B & Others (IA 1/2026 in O.S 9/2026) Outcome: The petition for temporary prohibitory injunction was dismissed. The court vacated the earlier injunction granted on 13.01.2026, finding the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case against the defendants. Key Facts: Petitioner claimed entitlement to Rs. 7,70,000 from defendants based on a 2024 property exchange agreement. However, petitioner himself witnessed subsequent agreements (2024-2025) transferring the property to the third defendant, and did not raise liability claims when the sale deed was executed. The third defendant now holds legal title, tax receipts, possession certificate, and building permit for the property. Court's Finding: The court found no documentary evidence supporting petitioner's claimed liability from defendants, and ruled that granting an injunction would cause irreparable injury to the third defendant's established title and ongoing construction activities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Munsiff Court Kanjirappally All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case