Biju P S vs BAIJU B Advocate - GEORGE KURIAN — 9/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Status: Appearance of Parties. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

Appearance of Parties Next hearing 12-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLKT170000142026

Filing Number

9/2026

Filing Date

12-Jan-2026

Registration No

9/2026

Registration Date

13-Jan-2026

Court

Munsiff Court Kanjirappally

Judge

1-Munsiff, Kanjirappally

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Biju P S

    Adv. Ninan K.S

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BAIJU B Advocate - GEORGE KURIAN

  2. 2.SOUMYAMOL K D

    Adv. GEORGE KURIAN

  3. 3.SHARAJ K K

    Adv. Premchand,Dilsha A A RAGESH T B YEDHU KRISHNAN V J Saneeta ROBIN Premchand

Case History

  1. 12-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: Biju P S v. Baiju B & Others (IA 1/2026 in O.S 9/2026) Outcome: The petition for temporary prohibitory injunction was dismissed. The court vacated the earlier injunction granted on 13.01.2026, finding the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case against the defendants. Key Facts: Petitioner claimed entitlement to Rs. 7,70,000 from defendants based on a 2024 property exchange agreement. However, petitioner himself witnessed subsequent agreements (2024-2025) transferring the property to the third defendant, and did not raise liability claims when the sale deed was executed. The third defendant now holds legal title, tax receipts, possession certificate, and building permit for the property. Court's Finding: The court found no documentary evidence supporting petitioner's claimed liability from defendants, and ruled that granting an injunction would cause irreparable injury to the third defendant's established title and ongoing construction activities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Appearance of Parties

    Munsiff, Kanjirappally

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Call On

    Munsiff, Kanjirappally

  5. 04-Apr-2026

    Call On

    Munsiff, Kanjirappally

  6. 01-Apr-2026

    Call On

    Munsiff, Kanjirappally

  7. 23-Mar-2026

    For Hearing

    Munsiff, Kanjirappally

  8. 16-Mar-2026

    For Hearing on IA

    Munsiff, Kanjirappally

  9. 16-Feb-2026

    Written Statement

    Munsiff, Kanjirappally

  10. 13-Jan-2026

    OrderView PDF

  11. 13-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 12-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 9/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Biju P S v. Baiju B & Others (IA 1/2026 in O.S 9/2026) Outcome: The petition for temporary prohibitory injunction was dismissed. The court vacated the earlier injunction granted on 13.01.2026, finding the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case against the defendants. Key Facts: Petitioner claimed entitlement to Rs. 7,70,000 from defendants based on a 2024 property exchange agreement. However, petitioner himself witnessed subsequent agreements (2024-2025) transferring the property to the third defendant, and did not raise liability claims when the sale deed was executed. The third defendant now holds legal title, tax receipts, possession certificate, and building permit for the property. Court's Finding: The court found no documentary evidence supporting petitioner's claimed liability from defendants, and ruled that granting an injunction would cause irreparable injury to the third defendant's established title and ongoing construction activities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case