Titus Mathew vs Kuttiyamma George Alias Brijith Advocate - BIJU ZACHARIAS KOLADY, Mathew Mathai Muthukadan — 100049/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96,O41,R1. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 31st March 2026.

Case disposed

AS - CIVIL APPEAL

CNR: KLKT100004112023

e-Filing Number

08-08-2023

Filing Number

100426/2023

Filing Date

09-Aug-2023

Registration No

100049/2023

Registration Date

09-Aug-2023

Court

Sub Court, Pala

Judge

1-Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

Decision Date

31-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 96,O41,R1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Titus Mathew

    Adv. USHA MENON

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kuttiyamma George Alias Brijith Advocate - BIJU ZACHARIAS KOLADY, Mathew Mathai Muthukadan

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 31-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

  3. 31-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: IA 1/2026 in AS 49/2023 Court Decision: The Sub Judge dismissed the application seeking to admit the original document (Exhibit B2) as additional evidence in the appellate proceedings. The court found that none of the conditions under Order XLI Rule 27 CPC for admitting additional evidence were satisfied, particularly because the applicant failed to demonstrate due diligence or necessity for producing the original document more than two years after appeal filing. Key Reasoning: The court applied the legal principle that additional evidence at appellate stage is only permissible in limited circumstances—when the trial court refused to admit evidence that should have been admitted, or when evidence could not be produced despite due diligence, or when necessary for proper adjudication. Since the photocopy had already been admitted and considered, and the applicant could not establish sufficient cause for the delayed production of the original, the application lacked merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 31-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

  5. 28-Mar-2026

    Order/Judgement

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    For Further Hearing

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    For Further Hearing

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

  8. 06-Mar-2026

    For Further Hearing

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

  9. 04-Mar-2026

    For Further Hearing

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

  10. 13-Feb-2026

    Listed to

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

  11. 10-Dec-2025

    Prays Time

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

  12. 13-Nov-2025

    Listed to

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

  13. 10-Oct-2025

    Listed to

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

  14. 19-Aug-2025

    Listed to

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

  15. 05-Aug-2025

    Call On

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

  16. 01-Aug-2025

    Prays Time

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

  17. 22-Mar-2025

    Listed to

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

  18. 05-Feb-2025

    Listed to

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

  19. 17-Dec-2024

    Listed to

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

  20. 05-Nov-2024

    Listed to

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

  21. 09-Sep-2024

    Listed to

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

  22. 04-Sep-2024

    Listed to

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

  23. 17-Jul-2024

    Listed to

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

  24. 07-Jun-2024

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

  25. 18-Mar-2024

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

  26. 17-Feb-2024

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

  27. 19-Dec-2023

    For Hearing

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

  28. 13-Oct-2023

    Adjourned

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

  29. 24-Aug-2023

    For L C R

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

  30. 17-Aug-2023

    For Objection and Hearing

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

  31. 10-Aug-2023

    Issue Notice

    Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge

  32. 09-Aug-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  33. 09-Aug-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 100049/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: IA 1/2026 in AS 49/2023 Court Decision: The Sub Judge dismissed the application seeking to admit the original document (Exhibit B2) as additional evidence in the appellate proceedings. The court found that none of the conditions under Order XLI Rule 27 CPC for admitting additional evidence were satisfied, particularly because the applicant failed to demonstrate due diligence or necessity for producing the original document more than two years after appeal filing. Key Reasoning: The court applied the legal principle that additional evidence at appellate stage is only permissible in limited circumstances—when the trial court refused to admit evidence that should have been admitted, or when evidence could not be produced despite due diligence, or when necessary for proper adjudication. Since the photocopy had already been admitted and considered, and the applicant could not establish sufficient cause for the delayed production of the original, the application lacked merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case