Najma P P vs Abdul Khadar C P Advocate - SIJO K — 13/2023
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.
MC - MISCELLANEOUS CASE
CNR: KLKN310001672023
Filing Number
153/2023
Filing Date
19-12-2023
Registration No
13/2023
Registration Date
19-12-2023
Court
Gramnyayalaya Irikkur
Judge
1-Nyayadhikari
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Najma P P
Adv. M. Govindankutty
Respondent(s)
Abdul Khadar C P Advocate - SIJO K
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Nyayadhikari
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
Order/ Judgement
Order/ Judgement
For further hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 10-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 03-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 25-02-2026 | For further hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
CASE SUMMARY: Najma P P v. Abdul Khadar C P (MC 13/2023) Court: Gramapanchayat Court, Irikkur | Judge: Sri. Srijayan V Decision: Petition PARTIALLY ALLOWED Key Holdings: The court found the respondent (husband) guilty of domestic violence under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The petitioner established both physical and mental cruelty through her testimony and evidence, despite absence of medical records or FIR. Orders Granted: 1. Respondent restrained from physically harming petitioner 2. Respondent barred from entering shared household (the marital property) 3. Petitioner's right to peacefully occupy the property protected 4. Maintenance for minor daughter: ₹5,000/month from respondent 5. Compensation for emotional distress: ₹1,00,000 Dismissed: Petitioner's claim for return of 25 sovereign gold ornaments—insufficient evidence that ornaments remained with respondent's custody vs. being sold for property purchase. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
CASE SUMMARY: Najma P P v. Abdul Khadar C P (MC 13/2023) Court: Gramapanchayat Court, Irikkur | Judge: Sri. Srijayan V Decision: Petition PARTIALLY ALLOWED Key Holdings: The court found the respondent (husband) guilty of domestic violence under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The petitioner established both physical and mental cruelty through her testimony and evidence, despite absence of medical records or FIR. Orders Granted: 1. Respondent restrained from physically harming petitioner 2. Respondent barred from entering shared household (the marital property) 3. Petitioner's right to peacefully occupy the property protected 4. Maintenance for minor daughter: ₹5,000/month from respondent 5. Compensation for emotional distress: ₹1,00,000 Dismissed: Petitioner's claim for return of 25 sovereign gold ornaments—insufficient evidence that ornaments remained with respondent's custody vs. being sold for property purchase. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts