Manoj V K V vs Ittapurath Naduvile Purayil Kunhaleema Advocate - UMMER K — 126/2025

Case under Building (Lease and Rent Control )Act, 1959 Section 18. Status: call on. Next hearing: 15th September 2026.

call on Next hearing 15-Sep-2026 in 5 weeks

RCA - CIVIL APPEAL (RENT CONTROL)

CNR: KLKN160012552025

Filing Number

26206/2025

Filing Date

14-Nov-2025

Registration No

126/2025

Registration Date

19-Nov-2025

Court

Motor Accident Claims Tribunal / District and Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Taliparamba

Judge

1-Judge MACT/Additional District and Sessions Court

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Building (Lease and Rent Control )Act, 1959 Section 18

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Manoj V K V

    Adv. MM Shajith

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ittapurath Naduvile Purayil Kunhaleema Advocate - UMMER K

  2. 2.Abida

  3. 3.Ashraf

  4. 4.Ali Akbar

  5. 5.Arif

    Adv. SHYAMA A

  6. 6.Mujeeb

    Adv. SHYAMA A

Case History

  1. 15-Sep-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: RCA 126/2025 In this rent control appeal heard by the Additional District Court, Taliparamba on March 16, 2026, the court ordered that the rent amount is paid, extended the stay until further orders, and called for the trial court record for further proceedings. All respondents appeared before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    call on

    Judge MACT/Additional District and Sessions Court

  4. 12-Jan-2026

    call on

    Judge MACT/Additional District and Sessions Court

  5. 15-Dec-2025

    Issue Fresh Notice

    Judge MACT/Additional District and Sessions Court

  6. 28-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 14-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 126/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCA 126/2025 In this rent control appeal heard by the Additional District Court, Taliparamba on March 16, 2026, the court ordered that the rent amount is paid, extended the stay until further orders, and called for the trial court record for further proceedings. All respondents appeared before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case