Vayakkal Thazhepurayil Mushrath vs Thazhath Madathil Muhammad Kunhi Advocate - Roopesh MP — 146/2025
Case under Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 (Kerala) Section 11 (2) (a) (b), 11(3). Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED AS NOT PRESSED on 17th March 2026.
RCP - RENT CONTROL PETITION
CNR: KLKN120004082025
Filing Number
984/2025
Filing Date
10-Sep-2025
Registration No
146/2025
Registration Date
07-Oct-2025
Court
Additional Munsiffs Court Kannur
Judge
4-Addl. Munsiff/Jfcm 5, Kannur
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED AS NOT PRESSED
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Vayakkal Thazhepurayil Mushrath
Adv. Babu Manden
Respondent(s)
-
1.Thazhath Madathil Muhammad Kunhi Advocate - Roopesh MP
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The Rent Control Court, Kannur dismissed Rent Control Petition No. 146/2025 filed by Vayakkal Thazhepurayil Mushrath against respondent Thazhath Madathil Muhammad Kunhi under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965. The petition was dismissed as not pressed after the respondent surrendered the key and the petitioner's counsel filed a memo stating the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the case. No order regarding costs was issued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl. Munsiff/Jfcm 5, Kannur
-
13-Mar-2026
call on
Addl. Munsiff/Jfcm 5, Kannur
-
06-Feb-2026
For evidence
Addl. Munsiff/Jfcm 5, Kannur
-
07-Jan-2026
For counter
Addl. Munsiff/Jfcm 5, Kannur
-
10-Nov-2025
For counter
Addl. Munsiff/Jfcm 5, Kannur
-
07-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 146/2025
The Rent Control Court, Kannur dismissed Rent Control Petition No. 146/2025 filed by Vayakkal Thazhepurayil Mushrath against respondent Thazhath Madathil Muhammad Kunhi under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965. The petition was dismissed as not pressed after the respondent surrendered the key and the petitioner's counsel filed a memo stating the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the case. No order regarding costs was issued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts